Literature DB >> 11490233

Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study.

B Djavan1, M Waldert, A Zlotta, P Dobronski, C Seitz, M Remzi, A Borkowski, C Schulman, M Marberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluate the safety, morbidity and complication rates for first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection Study 1,051 men, with total prostate specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng./ml., underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy plus 2 additional transition zone biopsies. Biopsy samples were also obtained from suspicious areas identified during transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination. All 820 patients with biopsy samples negative for prostate cancer underwent re-biopsy after 6 weeks. Immediate and delayed (range 1 to 7 days) morbidity, patient satisfaction and complication rates were recorded.
RESULTS: Of the 1,051 subjects the initial biopsy was positive for prostate cancer in 231 and negative, including benign prostatic hyperplasia or benign tissue, in 820. Of these 820 patients prostate cancer was detected in 10% (83) on re-biopsy. Minor or no discomfort was observed in 92% and 89% of patients at first and re-biopsy, respectively (p = 0.29). Immediate morbidity was minor and included rectal bleeding (2.1% versus 2.4%, p = 0.13), mild hematuria (62% versus 57%, p = 0.06), severe hematuria (0.7% versus 0.5%, p = 0.09) and moderate to severe vasovagal episodes (2.8% versus 1.4%, respectively, p = 0.03). Delayed morbidity of first and re-biopsy was comprised of fever (2.9% versus 2.3%, p = 0.08), hematospermia (9.8% versus 10.2%, p = 0.1), recurrent mild hematuria (15.9% versus 16.6%, p = 0.06), persistent dysuria (7.2% versus 6.8%, p = 0.12) and urinary tract infection (10.9% versus 11.3%, respectively, p = 0.07). Major complications were rare and included urosepsis (0.1% versus 0%) and rectal bleeding that required intervention (0% versus 0.1%, respectively). Furthermore, an age dependent pattern of pain apprehension during biopsy was observed with the highest scores in patients younger than 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is generally well tolerated with minor morbidity only rarely requiring treatment. Re-biopsy can be performed 6 weeks later with no significant difference in pain or morbidity. Patients younger than 60 years should be counseled in regard to a higher level of discomfort, and local and topical anesthesia if desired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11490233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  73 in total

Review 1.  Robotic prostate biopsy and its relevance to focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Henry Ho; John S P Yuen; Christopher W S Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  [Complications of transrectal prostate biopsy. Determination of current status].

Authors:  H W Gottfried; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology.

Authors:  Assaad El-Hakim; Sabri Moussa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

5.  Peri-procedural povidone-iodine rectal preparation reduces microorganism counts and infectious complications following ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Justin R Gyorfi; Christopher Otteni; Kevin Brown; Amar Patel; Kathleen Lehman; Brett E Phillips; Kalyan Dewan; Girish Kirimanjeswara; Jay D Raman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  A life-threatening hematochesia after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in a prostate cancer case presenting with lymphedema.

Authors:  Yücel Ustündağ; Cetin Yeşilli; Selim Aydemir; Ahmet Savranlar; Kamuran Yazicioğlu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Endoclipping treatment of life-threatening rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; Jannis Kountouras; Georgios Dimitriadis; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Christos Zavos; Ioannis Pilpilidis; George Paroutoglou; George Germanidis; Kostas Mimidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

9.  Febrile infection in post-prostate biopsy: results of a ten-year single-institution study in South Taiwan.

Authors:  Yuh-Shyan Tsai; Chia-Hong Chen; Yeong-Chin Jou; Wen-Horng Yang; Chien-Chen Chang; Tzong-Shin Tzai
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 10.  Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Hayet Amalou; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Pingkun Yan; Jochen Kruecker; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.