Literature DB >> 20224265

Is it possible to predict sepsis, the most serious complication in prostate biopsy?

Adnan Simsir1, Erkan Kismali, Rashad Mammadov, Gurhan Gunaydin, Cag Cal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is a common procedure used in daily urology practice with a low complication rate and easy applicability. In this study, the precipitating factors and prophylaxis for sepsis, the worst complication of the procedure, were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 2,023 Patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent biopsy by TRUS in one center were assessed retrospectively. The relationship between sepsis and age, serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, prostate volume, number of biopsies, number of repeated biopsies, accompanying diagnosis of prostatitis, presence of urethral catheter, and presence of diabetes mellitus was assessed. Data were analyzed using the t test and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 2,023 patients, 62 (3.06%) developed sepsis within 5 days after biopsy. There was no significant relationship between the biopsy and the above parameters using the logistic regression analysis. Using the t test, it was found that the number of biopsy cores (p < 0.001), presence of urethral catheter (p < 0.0001), and presence of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001) were predictive factors for sepsis.
CONCLUSION: Sepsis is a rare but life-threatening complication after prostate biopsy by TRUS. Although preoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics and enema before biopsy have proven to be effective in decreasing urinary tract infection rates, patients with urethral catheter, diabetes mellitus or those to undergo biopsy from more sites than ten cores should be closely monitored after biopsy. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20224265     DOI: 10.1159/000296290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  26 in total

1.  Infective complications in patients after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli colonization in rectal flora.

Authors:  Mustafa Bilal Hamarat; Fatih Tarhan; Rahim Horuz; Gülfem Akengin Öcal; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Alper Kafkaslı; Özgür Yazıcı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  Does metabolic syndrome increase the risk of infective complications after prostate biopsy? A critical evaluation.

Authors:  Cahit Sahin; Bilal Eryildirim; A Cihangir Cetinel; Gokhan Faydaci; Fehmi Narter; Cemal Goktas; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Versus Transperineal Mapping Prostate Biopsy: Complication Comparison.

Authors:  Vassilios M Skouteris; E David Crawford; Vladimir Mouraviev; Paul Arangua; Marios Panagiotis Metsinis; Michael Skouteris; George Zacharopoulos; Nelson N Stone
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

Review 4.  Reducing infection rates after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Adrian Pilatz; Przemyslaw Waliszewski; Wolfgang Weidner; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

6.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers.

Authors:  Dmitry Volkin; Baris Turkbey; Anthony N Hoang; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Nitin Yerram; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Jeffrey W Nix; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.

Authors:  Vidhush K Yarlagadda; Win Shun Lai; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Kristin K Porter; Jeffrey W Nix; John V Thomas; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 9.  All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Incidence of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: A retrospective population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jan Krzysztof Rudzinski; Jun Kawakami
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.