Literature DB >> 22819419

Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy.

Tania Hossack1, Manish I Patel, Andrew Huo, Phillip Brenner, Carlo Yuen, Daniel Spernat, Jayne Mathews, Anne-Marie Haynes, Rob Sutherland, Warick del Prado, Phillip Stricker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anterior tumors are estimated to constitute 20% of prostate cancers. Current data indicate that transperineal biopsy is more reliable than transrectal biopsy in identifying these tumors. If correct, this superior reliability should result in an increased proportion of anterior tumors identified by transperineal biopsy. We investigated this hypothesis with reference to prostatectomy specimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radical prostatectomy histopathology records were retrospectively examined. Patients were grouped based on primary transperineal or transrectal biopsy as the modality used to identify the initial cancer. After grouping, tumor location and size were recorded and, thus, the proportion of anterior tumors was determined.
RESULTS: A total of 1,132 (414 transperineal and 718 transrectal) prostatectomy specimens were examined. Overall mean tumor size (1.8 and 2.0 cm(3)), stage (pT2 63.3% and 61%) and significance (5.1% and 5.1%) for the transperineal and transrectal methods were similar. However, the transperineal method was associated with proportionally more anterior tumors (16.2% vs 12%, p = 0.046), and identified them at a smaller size (1.4 vs 2.1 cm(3), p = 0.03) and lower stage (extracapsular extension 13% vs 28%, p = 0.03) compared to the transrectal method. The pT3 positive surgical margin rate for anterior vs other tumors was 69% vs 34.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall transrectal and transperineal biopsy identify cancers that are similar in size, stage and significance. However, transperineal biopsy detected proportionally more anterior tumors (16.2% vs 12%), and identified them at a smaller size (1.4 vs 2.1 cm(3)) and stage (extracapsular extension 13% vs 28%) compared to transrectal biopsy. Identifying anterior tumors early is important because the positive surgical margin rate for anterior pT3 lesions is significantly higher.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819419     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

1.  Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Shady Nafie; Raj P Pal; John P Dormer; Masood A Khan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Anterior tumors of the prostate: diagnosis and significance.

Authors:  Priya N Werahera; E David Crawford; Francisco G La Rosa; Kathleen C Torkko; Beth Schulte; Holly T Sullivan; Adrie van Bokhoven; M Scott Lucia; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.344

3.  Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms.

Authors:  N Westhoff; F P Siegel; D Hausmann; M Polednik; J von Hardenberg; M S Michel; M Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Javier Romero-Otero; Borja García-Gómez; José M Duarte-Ojeda; Alfredo Rodríguez-Antolín; Antoni Vilaseca; Sigrid V Carlsson; Karim A Touijer
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Prostate biopsy: results and advantages of the transperineal approach--twenty-year experience of a single center.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Francesco Aragona
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Gleason grade accuracy of transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies in MRI-naïve patients.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Modher Al-Shawi; Tess Howard; Nathan Papa; Cedric Poyet; Brian Kelly; A J Matthew Egan; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien Bolton; Gregory S Jack
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Hayet Amalou; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Pingkun Yan; Jochen Kruecker; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Midterm oncological outcome and clinicopathological characteristics of anterior prostate cancers treated by endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel W Good; Grant D Stewart; Paimaun Zakikhani; Henry Yuen; Antony C P Riddick; Prasad R Bollina; Marie O'Donnell; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; S Alan McNeill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Leonard Marks; Shelena Young; Shyam Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  [Value of MRI/ultrasound fusion in primary biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Distler; J P Radtke; C Kesch; M Roethke; H-P Schlemmer; W Roth; M Hohenfellner; B Hadaschik
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.