Literature DB >> 23787356

Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.

Stacy Loeb1, Annelies Vellekoop, Hashim U Ahmed, James Catto, Mark Emberton, Robert Nam, Derek J Rosario, Vincenzo Scattoni, Yair Lotan.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Prostate biopsy is commonly performed for cancer detection and management. The benefits and risks of prostate biopsy are germane to ongoing debates about prostate cancer screening and treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of complications from prostate biopsy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on the following complications: hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, infection, pain, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, and mortality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: After biopsy, hematuria and hematospermia are common but typically mild and self-limiting. Severe rectal bleeding is uncommon. Despite antimicrobial prophylaxis, infectious complications are increasing over time and are the most common reason for hospitalization after biopsy. Pain may occur at several stages of prostate biopsy and can be mitigated by anesthetic agents and anxiety-reduction techniques. Up to 25% of men have transient LUTS after biopsy, and <2% have frank urinary retention, with slightly higher rates reported after transperineal template biopsy. Biopsy-related mortality is rare.
CONCLUSIONS: Preparation for biopsy should include antimicrobial prophylaxis and pain management. Prostate biopsy is frequently associated with minor bleeding and urinary symptoms that usually do not require intervention. Infectious complications can be serious, requiring prompt management and continued work into preventative strategies. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Bleeding; Complications; Infection; Mortality; Prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23787356     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  258 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Updates in the care and management of prostate cancer: highlights from the 2013 prostate cancer world congress, august 6-10, 2013, melbourne, australia.

Authors:  Marnique Basto; Aine Goggins; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

3.  Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed M Atwa; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A El-Ghar; Asaad Gaber; Essam Elsawy; Abdelwahab Hashem; Yasser Farag; Hashim Farg; Ali Elsorougy; Mohamed Fouda; Hossam Nabeeh; Ahmed Mosbah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Infective complications in patients after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli colonization in rectal flora.

Authors:  Mustafa Bilal Hamarat; Fatih Tarhan; Rahim Horuz; Gülfem Akengin Öcal; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Alper Kafkaslı; Özgür Yazıcı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

5.  Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ricardo Otazo; Daniel K Sodickson; Stella K Kang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stephen J Summers; Darshan P Patel; Blake D Hamilton; Angela P Presson; Mark A Fisher; William T Lowrance; Andrew W Southwick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Unscreened older men diagnosed with prostate cancer are at increased risk of aggressive disease.

Authors:  J J Tosoian; R Alam; C Gergis; A Narang; N Radwan; S Robertson; T McNutt; A E Ross; D Y Song; T L DeWeese; P T Tran; P C Walsh
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Prospective evaluation of the safety of transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy based on adverse events.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Satoshi Fukasawa; Atsushi Komaru; Masayuki Kobayashi; Yusuke Imamura; Takayuki Ohzeki; Kimiaki Takagi; Yosuke Sato; Koichiro Akakura; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Takeshi Ueda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jeffrey Weinreb; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Geert Villeirs; Baris Turkbey; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.