Literature DB >> 10512449

Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

G Walch1, R Badet, A Boulahia, A Khoury.   

Abstract

We studied the natural course and the possibility of making a prognostic classification of glenoid morphology in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). For this purpose, serial computed tomography scans of 113 osteoarthritic shoulders were reviewed. The position of the humeral head with respect to the glenoid seems to be an important predictor of the glenoid morphologic evolution. Three main glenoid types were defined: Type A, Type B, Type C. Type A (59%) was marked by a well-centered humeral head and a balanced distribution of strengths against the surface of the glenoid. The symmetric erosion was explained by the absence of subluxation. In Type B (32%), the posterior subluxation of the humeral head was responsible for the asymmetric load against the glenoid and was implicated in the development of primary GHOA, particularly the exaggerated posterior wear pattern. Type C (9%) was defined by a glenoid retroversion of more than 25 degrees, regardless of erosion; retroversion was primarily of dysplastic origin and explained the early event of osteoarthritis. In primary GHOA, this classification of the glenoid can discriminate retroversion between posterior erosion and dysplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512449     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90232-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  191 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; B M Berghs; E Audenaert; G Sys; G O Van Maele; E Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  [Therapy relevant imaging in modern surgical treatment of arthrosis of the shoulder : Interesting facts for orthopedic surgeons].

Authors:  R M Krifter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Catarina N Damas; Joana Silva; Márcia C Sá; João Torres
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-11-14

5.  Does an increase in modularity improve the outcomes of total shoulder replacement? Comparison across design generations.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Cathy Schleck; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: an update on indications, technique, results and complication rates.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mattei; Stefano Mortera; Chiara Arrigoni; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

7.  Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson; Pascal Boileau; Jay D Keener; James M Gregory; Dane H Salazar; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amar Malhas; Abbas Rashid; Dave Copas; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-05-06

9.  Neuropathic Pain after Shoulder Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Impact on Physical and Mental Function, and Demographic Determinants.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Linda J Woodhouse; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

10.  Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.