Literature DB >> 23523072

Liftoff resistance of augmented glenoid components during cyclic fatigue loading in the posterior-superior direction.

Joseph P Iannotti1, Kyle E Lappin, Conrad L Klotz, Erik W Reber, Steve W Swope.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Posterior glenoid bone loss is found in a majority of patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the shoulder. In total shoulder arthroplasty, several methods currently exist for management of this bone loss, including the use of an augmented glenoid component. Different augmented glenoid designs would be expected to vary in their resistance to loosening during mechanical bench-top testing. Our hypothesis is that a stepped augmented glenoid component will have less mechanical liftoff than augmented components of varying designs without a step.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four glenoid prototypes articulated with a humeral head were loaded with a 170-lb compressive load and with 4 mm of posterior-superior translation of the humeral head to 100,000 cycles. Anterior glenoid liftoff was measured.
RESULTS: The stepped glenoid component had significantly lower liftoff values (P < .05) compared with several other designs at many of the test intervals. DISCUSSION: A stepped design for an augmented glenoid component has superior fixation and less anterior glenoid liftoff in the presence of eccentric loading and may have better long-term clinical results.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented glenoid components; Basic Science Study; Biomechanics; Cadaveric Model; glenoid bone loss; in vitro study; mechanical testing; shoulder osteoarthritis; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523072     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  16 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The arthritic glenoid: anatomy and arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Louis M Ferreira; George S Athwal
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Surgical management of the biconcave (B2) glenoid.

Authors:  Kenneth W Donohue; Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 4.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  Soft tissue balancing in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Maike Mueller; Gregory Hoy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

6.  "Shaped" humeral head autograft reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Treatment for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with significant posterior glenoid bone loss (B2, B3, and C type).

Authors:  S Harmsen; D Casagrande; T Norris
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Jacob B Brenza; Emmanuel M Paul; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Number of pegs influence focal stress distributions and micromotion in glenoid implants: a finite element study.

Authors:  Abdul Hadi Abdul Wahab; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Muhammad Noor Harun; Tunku Kamarul; Ardiyansyah Syahrom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Posterior glenoid wear in total shoulder arthroplasty: eccentric anterior reaming is superior to posterior augment.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anthony W Behn; Derek Lindsey; Nicholas Giori; Emilie V Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison of Asymmetric Reaming versus a Posteriorly Augmented Component for Posterior Glenoid Wear and Retroversion: A Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Kevin Ko; Usman Ali Syed; Jonathan D Barlow; Scott Paxton; Bryan J Loeffler; Ocean Thakar; Grant Jamgochian; Joseph A Abboud; Charles L Getz; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.