Literature DB >> 22999848

A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components.

Matthew D Budge1, Michael D Kurdziel, Kevin C Baker, J Michael Wiater.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Porous-tantalum (PT)-backed glenoid components have recently been developed to improve fixation and minimize the incidence of glenoid component loosening, which remains a key limiting factor in long-term survival in total shoulder arthroplasty. PT-backed glenoids promote bony ingrowth as a method of preventing glenoid loosening at the prosthesis-glenoid interface. The use of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cement for initial fixation may prevent osteointegration due to mechanical occlusion of the porous surface and the nonosteoconductive properties of PMMA. This study aims to investigate alternative fixation methods of PT-backed glenoids in a biomechanical investigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine PT-backed monoblock glenoid components were implanted in a polyurethane bone substitute using either press-fit, PMMA cement, or calcium phosphate cement techniques. A control group of 3 all-polyethylene pegged glenoid components was implanted with PMMA. Glenoid and humeral head components were fixed to a biomechanical testing machine for testing according to ASTM Standard F-2028. The humeral head was translated ±1.5 mm along the superior-inferior axis for 50,000 cycles for characterization of glenoid rocking and inferior-superior translation.
RESULTS: Glenoid compression and glenoid distraction followed similar patterns for PT-backed glenoids. Overall, the all-polyethylene cemented glenoid demonstrated superior fixation compared to all PT-backed groups throughout the test. Glenoids fixed with PMMA cement displayed more favorable initial fixation and resistance to glenoid motion throughout cyclic testing.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that among PT-backed glenoids, PMMA fixation provided an increase in stability during initial and final cycles compared to press-fit and calcium-phosphate fixation techniques. This improved stability may enhance the osteointegration of the implant.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22999848     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  7 in total

1.  Radiographic and clinical outcomes of second generation Trabecular Metal™ glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raymond E Chen; Alexander M Brown; Alexander S Greenstein; Sandeep Mannava; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-24

2.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Jacob B Brenza; Emmanuel M Paul; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Characterisation of a metallic foam-cement composite under selected loading conditions.

Authors:  Gianluca Tozzi; Qing-Hang Zhang; Colin Lupton; Jie Tong; Teodolito Guillen; Arne Ohrndorf; Hans-Jurgen Christ
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Angelos Trellopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-25

6.  Biofunctionalization strategies on tantalum-based materials for osseointegrative applications.

Authors:  Carlos Mas-Moruno; Beatriz Garrido; Daniel Rodriguez; Elisa Ruperez; F Javier Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Biocompatibility of calcium phosphate bone cement with optimised mechanical properties: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Iwan Palmer; John Nelson; Wolfgang Schatton; Nicholas J Dunne; Fraser Buchanan; Susan A Clarke
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.