Literature DB >> 26621755

Feasibility of low-concentration iodinated contrast medium with lower-tube-voltage dual-source CT aortography using iterative reconstruction: comparison with automatic exposure control CT aortography.

Hee Jeong Shin1, Song Soo Kim2, Jae-Hwan Lee3, Jae-Hyeong Park3, Jin-Ok Jeong3, Seon Ah Jin3, Byung Seok Shin1, Kyung-Sook Shin1, Moonsang Ahn4.   

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of low-concentration contrast medium (CM) for vascular enhancement, image quality, and radiation dose on computed tomography aortography (CTA) using a combined low-tube-voltage and iterative reconstruction (IR) technique. Ninety subjects underwent dual-source CT (DSCT) operating in dual-source, high-pitch mode. DSCT scans were performed using both high-concentration CM (Group A, n = 50; Iomeprol 400) and low-concentration CM (Group B, n = 40; Iodixanol 270). Group A was scanned using a reference tube potential of 120 kVp and 120 reference mAs under automatic exposure control with IR. Group B was scanned using low-tube-voltage (80 or 100 kVp if body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2)) at a fixed current of 150 mAs, along with IR. Images of the two groups were compared regarding attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), iodine load, and radiation dose in various locations of the CTA. In comparison between Group A and Group B, the average mean attenuation (454.73 ± 86.66 vs. 515.96 ± 101.55 HU), SNR (25.28 ± 4.34 vs. 31.29 ± 4.58), and CNR (21.83 ± 4.20 vs. 27.55 ± 4.81) on CTA in Group B showed significantly greater values and significantly lower image noise values (18.76 ± 2.19 vs. 17.48 ± 3.34) than those in Group A (all Ps < 0.05). Homogeneous contrast enhancement from the ascending thoracic aorta to the infrarenal abdominal aorta was significantly superior in Group B (P < 0.05). Low-concentration CM and a low-tube-voltage combination technique using IR is a feasible method, showing sufficient contrast enhancement and image quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT aortography; Contrast medium; Dual-source CT; Iterative reconstruction; Radiation dose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621755     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0816-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  30 in total

1.  CT angiography of the renal arteries: comparison of lower-tube-voltage CTA with moderate-concentration iodinated contrast material and conventional CTA.

Authors:  Eun-Suk Cho; Jeong-Sik Yu; Jhii-Hyun Ahn; Joo Hee Kim; Jae-Joon Chung; Hyeon-Kyeong Lee; Kyung Hee Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Risk of iodinated contrast material--induced nephropathy with intravenous administration.

Authors:  Richard W Katzberg; Brendan J Barrett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Coronary artery calcium scoring using a reduced tube voltage and radiation dose protocol with dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Damini Dey; Ariel Gutstein; Ludovic Le Meunier; Victor Y Cheng; Raymond Pimentel; William Paz; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2009-10-13

4.  Bolus dynamics: theoretical and experimental aspects.

Authors:  M J Blomley; P Dawson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Peter F Hahn; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakayama; Kazuo Awai; Yoshinori Funama; Duo Liu; Takeshi Nakaura; Yoshitaka Tamura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning.

Authors:  R A Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Renal failure in 57 925 patients undergoing coronary procedures using iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast media.

Authors:  P Liss; P B Persson; P Hansell; B Lagerqvist
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakayama; Kazuo Awai; Yoshinori Funama; Masahiro Hatemura; Masanori Imuta; Takeshi Nakaura; Da Ryu; Shoji Morishita; Shamima Sultana; Natsuko Sato; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Whole-body CT angiography with low tube voltage and low-concentration contrast material to reduce radiation dose and iodine load.

Authors:  Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Toshiharu Miyoshi; Hiroshi Kondo; Haruo Watanabe; Yoshifumi Noda; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  A prospective evaluation of contrast and radiation dose and image quality in cardiac CT in children with complex congenital heart disease using low-concentration iodinated contrast agent and low tube voltage and current.

Authors:  Qiao-Ru Hou; Wei Gao; Ai-Min Sun; Qian Wang; Hai-Sheng Qiu; Fang Wang; Li-Wei Hu; Jian-Ying Li; Yu-Min Zhong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of the image quality and radiation dose of different scanning modes in head-neck CT angiography.

Authors:  Tianle Zhang; Xue Geng; Dongxue Li; Yize Xu; Yongxia Zhao
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Low radiation dose in computed tomography: the role of iodine.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Carlo Catalano; Miles A Kirchin; Martin Krix; Thomas Albrecht
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.039

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.