Fan Zhang1, Li Yang2, Xiang Song2, Ying-Na Li2, Yan Jiang3, Xing-Hua Zhang2, Hai-Yue Ju2, Jian Wu2, Rui-Ping Chang2. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Hainan Branch of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Sanya, China. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. 3 Clinical Science Imaging System, Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of low-tube-voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) combined with contrast medium (CM) reduction and iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on patients with standard body mass index compared with clinical routine protocol. METHODS: Retrospectively gated helical CCTA scans were acquired using a 256-slice multi-slice CT (Brilliance iCT; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) on 94 patients with standard body mass index (20-25 kg m(-2)) who were randomly assigned into 2 groups. The scan protocol for Group 1 was 100 kVp and 600 mAs with 70 ml CM at an injection rate of 4.5-5.5 ml s(-1); images were reconstructed by a hybrid iterative reconstruction technique (iDose(4); Philips Healthcare). Group 2 was scanned at 80 kVp and 600 mAs with 35 ml CM at an injection rate of 3.5-4.5 ml s(-1); images were reconstructed with IMR. Objective measurements such as the mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio of the two groups were measured on CT images and compared using the paired t-test. In addition, a subjective image quality evaluation was performed by two radiologists who were blinded to the scan protocol, using a 5-point scale [1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)]. The results of the two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The iodine delivery rate of Group 2 was 1.0 ± 0.5 gI s(-1) compared with 2.1 ± 0.5 gI s(-1) in Group 1 resulting in a reduction of 52.4%. In addition, an effective radiation dose reduction of 56.4% was achieved in Group 2 (2.4 ± 1.2 mSv) compared with Group 1 (5.5 ± 1.4 mSv). The mean CT attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality of all segments in Group 2 were significantly improved compared with those in Group 1 (all, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The use of IMR along with a low tube voltage (80 kVp) combined with a low CM protocol for CCTA can reduce both radiation and CM dose with improved image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In this study, we used a novel knowledge-based IMR which remarkably reduced the image noise. We compared the quality of the images obtained when the tube voltage was reduced to 80 kVp and that of those obtained according to the clinical routine protocols to determine whether ultra-low-dose imaging plus IMR is feasible in CCTA scans. We found that a low dose protocol combined with 80 kVp and reduced CM for CCTA can reduce both radiation dose and CM dose with improved image quality by the use of IMR in non-obese patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of low-tube-voltage (80 kVp) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) combined with contrast medium (CM) reduction and iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on patients with standard body mass index compared with clinical routine protocol. METHODS: Retrospectively gated helical CCTA scans were acquired using a 256-slice multi-slice CT (Brilliance iCT; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) on 94 patients with standard body mass index (20-25 kg m(-2)) who were randomly assigned into 2 groups. The scan protocol for Group 1 was 100 kVp and 600 mAs with 70 ml CM at an injection rate of 4.5-5.5 ml s(-1); images were reconstructed by a hybrid iterative reconstruction technique (iDose(4); Philips Healthcare). Group 2 was scanned at 80 kVp and 600 mAs with 35 ml CM at an injection rate of 3.5-4.5 ml s(-1); images were reconstructed with IMR. Objective measurements such as the mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio of the two groups were measured on CT images and compared using the paired t-test. In addition, a subjective image quality evaluation was performed by two radiologists who were blinded to the scan protocol, using a 5-point scale [1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)]. The results of the two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The iodine delivery rate of Group 2 was 1.0 ± 0.5 gI s(-1) compared with 2.1 ± 0.5 gI s(-1) in Group 1 resulting in a reduction of 52.4%. In addition, an effective radiation dose reduction of 56.4% was achieved in Group 2 (2.4 ± 1.2 mSv) compared with Group 1 (5.5 ± 1.4 mSv). The mean CT attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality of all segments in Group 2 were significantly improved compared with those in Group 1 (all, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The use of IMR along with a low tube voltage (80 kVp) combined with a low CM protocol for CCTA can reduce both radiation and CM dose with improved image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In this study, we used a novel knowledge-based IMR which remarkably reduced the image noise. We compared the quality of the images obtained when the tube voltage was reduced to 80 kVp and that of those obtained according to the clinical routine protocols to determine whether ultra-low-dose imaging plus IMR is feasible in CCTA scans. We found that a low dose protocol combined with 80 kVp and reduced CM for CCTA can reduce both radiation dose and CM dose with improved image quality by the use of IMR in non-obesepatients.
Authors: Casper Mihl; Madeleine Kok; Joachim E Wildberger; Jakub Turek; Georg Muehlenbruch; Marco Das Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Michael M Lell; Gregor Jost; Johannes Georg Korporaal; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Thomas G Flohr; Michael Uder; Hubertus Pietsch Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Nico Buls; Gert Van Gompel; Toon Van Cauteren; Koenraad Nieboer; Inneke Willekens; Guy Verfaillie; Paul Evans; Sven Macholl; Ben Newton; Johan de Mey Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-11-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Beatrice Hirt Moch; Fran Mikulicic; Jan Vontobel; Tobias A Fuchs; Julia Stehli; Olivier F Clerc; Mathias Possner; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Azien Laqmani; Maximillian Kurfürst; Sebastian Butscheidt; Susanne Sehner; Jakob Schmidt-Holtz; Cyrus Behzadi; Hans Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Marc Regier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240