Literature DB >> 26576791

Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation.

Arrigo Fruscalzo1,2, Ambrogio P Londero3, Ralf Schmitz4.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the influence on feasibility and reliability of quantitative tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-based cervical elastography of the cycle phase and of the derivative pitch (DP) selected during tissue strain (TS) calculation across all three trimesters of pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pilot study included 17 patients collected between the 12th and the 42nd week of gestation. The TS was measured by a single operator by quantitative elastography. The influence of DP values (5, 10, 15, and 20 mm) and phase (compression versus relaxation) was tested after a cycle of freehand compression and relaxation of the cervix through the vaginal probe. Feasibility and intra-operator intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) agreement for strain measurement were also evaluated for every setting used.
RESULTS: TS values were inversely correlated with DP and were slightly higher if measured during a compression phase. TDI-based cervical elastography was feasible in all cases. Reliability for the process of strain calculation of different raw datasets was very good (ICC agreement ranging between 0.79 and 0.87), while excellent considering the same raw dataset (ICC agreement ranging between 0.93 and 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: The DP and cycle phase influenced the strain values calculated. Nonetheless, TDI-based cervical elastography was feasible and reliable for all the settings considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical elastography; Cervix uteri; Derivative pitch; Pregnancy; Reproducibility of results; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576791     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-015-0619-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  17 in total

1.  Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  F S Molina; L F Gómez; J Florido; M C Padilla; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  The secret cervix.

Authors:  P Rozenberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Quantitative cervical elastography in pregnancy.

Authors:  A Fruscalzo; R Schmitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Predicting onset of labor from echogenicity of the cervical gland area on vaginal ultrasonography at term.

Authors:  Michiko Yamaguchi; Tekehiko Fukami; Hirobumi Asakura; Toshiyuki Takeshita
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.901

5.  Cervical strain determined by ultrasound elastography and its association with spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Roberto Romero; Steven J Korzeniewski; Hyunyoung Ahn; Alma Aurioles-Garibay; Maynor Garcia; Alyse G Schwartz; Lami Yeo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.901

6.  Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features.

Authors:  A P Londero; S Bertozzi; A Fruscalzo; L Driul; D Marchesoni
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  What challenges must be overcome before ultrasound elasticity imaging is ready for the clinic?

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-08

8.  Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success.

Authors:  A Fruscalzo; A P Londero; C Fröhlich; M Meyer-Wittkopf; R Schmitz
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.548

9.  Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  E Hernandez-Andrade; S S Hassan; H Ahn; S J Korzeniewski; L Yeo; T Chaiworapongsa; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Reliability of cervix elastography in the late first and second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  A Fruscalzo; R Schmitz; W Klockenbusch; J Steinhard
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.548

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Edoardo Mazza; Helen Feltovich; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Fetal adrenal gland biometry and cervical elastography as predictors of preterm birth: A comparative study.

Authors:  Shubhra Agarwal; Arjit Agarwal; Pawan Joon; Shalini Saraswat; Shruti Chandak
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-07

Review 3.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Malgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund; Krzysztof Preis
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-04-21

4.  Performance Study of a Torsional Wave Sensor and Cervical Tissue Characterization.

Authors:  Antonio Callejas; Antonio Gomez; Juan Melchor; Miguel Riveiro; Paloma Massó; Jorge Torres; Modesto T López-López; Guillermo Rus
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.