Literature DB >> 24557633

Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success.

A Fruscalzo1, A P Londero2, C Fröhlich1, M Meyer-Wittkopf3, R Schmitz4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of quantitative elastography of the cervix in the prediction of successful labor induction compared to the Bishop score (BS) and ultrasound cervical length (CL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted between July 2010 and June 2011 in patients without preterm membrane rupture undergoing labor induction with vaginal prostaglandins. Before starting induction, the BS, functional CL and cervical tissue strain (TS) were assessed. TS assessment was performed twice using the Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) software. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated for the prediction of the following endpoints: active labor achievement (success vs. failure, time interval < 24 h and < 48 h), vaginal delivery (success vs. failure, time interval < 36 h and < 72 h) and total amount of prostaglandins used for labor induction (< 6 mg and < 12 mg).
RESULTS: We analyzed 77 patients with a mean gestational age of 39.7 ± 1.5 weeks of gestation and a mean strain of 0.75 ± 0.17. The TS significantly predicted a failure of labor induction, which occurred in 4 cases, both in mono- and multivariate analysis, independently of the functional cervical length (TS 0.6 ± 0.1). No correlation was found between the TS and other outcomes. The Bishop score and functional cervical length were found to predict only an early response to labor induction (time to active labor < 24 h, time to vaginal delivery < 36 h and PG usage < 6 mg). The diagnostic accuracy was slightly but not significantly improved if both TS and CL were considered.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary data show the possible usefulness of quantitative cervical elastography in the prediction of labor induction failure. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557633     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1355572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  9 in total

Review 1.  The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin M Myers; Helen Feltovich; Edoardo Mazza; Joy Vink; Michael Bajka; Ronald J Wapner; Timothy J Hall; Michael House
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery.

Authors:  K Köbbing; A Fruscalzo; K Hammer; M Möllers; M Falkenberg; R Kwiecien; W Klockenbusch; R Schmitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Edoardo Mazza; Helen Feltovich; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Ambrogio P Londero; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 5.  Innovative methods of cervical assessment and potential for novel treatment.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich; Michael House
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18-24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Eli Maymon; Suchaya Luewan; Gaurav Bhatti; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Offer Erez; Percy Pacora; Bogdan Done; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.716

Review 7.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Malgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund; Krzysztof Preis
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-04-21

8.  Predictive value of cervical length by ultrasound and cervical strain elastography in labor induction at term.

Authors:  Yimin Zhou; Neng Jin; Qinqing Chen; Min Lv; Ying Jiang; Yuan Chen; Fangfang Xi; Mengmeng Yang; Baihui Zhao; Hefeng Huang; Qiong Luo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Quantitative elastography for cervical stiffness assessment during pregnancy.

Authors:  A Fruscalzo; A P Londero; C Fröhlich; U Möllmann; R Schmitz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.