Literature DB >> 20145939

Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features.

A P Londero1, S Bertozzi, A Fruscalzo, L Driul, D Marchesoni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cervical length during the first trimester of pregnancy has not been completely investigated yet. The objective of our study is to compare cervical size in the first ten gestational weeks with that of non-pregnant women, and to determine its correlation with maternal factors, including age, anthropometric features, and reproductive history.
METHODS: We collected retrospective data about women who applied to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatients Facility of Udine between February and June 2009, selecting both pregnant and non-pregnant women possessing a transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of their cervix, and focusing on their age, parity, BMI, cervical, and uterine size. Data were analyzed by R (version.2.8.0), considering significant P < 0.05.
RESULTS: 135 women were recruited. By multivariate linear regression, both cervical length and width result independently influenced by pregnancy status, and among non-pregnant nullipara, cervical length results to be significantly lower in women younger than 20 (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: During the first ten gestational weeks, cervix results to be longer and wider than in non-pregnant women, suggesting the possible existence of early gestational, morphological, uterine, and cervical modifications. Women under the age of 20 have a significantly shorter cervix, suggesting an incomplete cervix maturity in this group of women, which may justify the higher prevalence of pre-term births in teenage pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20145939     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1377-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  7 in total

1.  Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Roberto Romero; Hyunyoung Ahn; Youssef Hussein; Lami Yeo; Steven J Korzeniewski; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-03-16

2.  Comparison of the POP-Q examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and direct anatomic measurement of cervical length.

Authors:  Christina E Dancz; Lisa Werth; Vanessa Sun; Sandy Lee; Daphne Walker; Begüm Özel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Edoardo Mazza; Helen Feltovich; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Rajeev Ramanah; Kenneth E Guire; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Ambrogio P Londero; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Elastography in predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic, low-risk women: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Slawomir Wozniak; Piotr Czuczwar; Piotr Szkodziak; Pawel Milart; Ewa Wozniakowska; Tomasz Paszkowski
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Pelvic Ultrasound Findings in Women with Obstetric Fistula: A Cross-Sectional Study of Cases and Controls.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Wilkinson; Angela M Bengtson; Ennet Chipungu; Rachel J Pope; Bonus Makanani; Margaret Moyo; Mwawi Mwale; Jennifer H Tang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.