Literature DB >> 24356388

Cervical strain determined by ultrasound elastography and its association with spontaneous preterm delivery.

Edgar Hernandez-Andrade, Roberto Romero, Steven J Korzeniewski, Hyunyoung Ahn, Alma Aurioles-Garibay, Maynor Garcia, Alyse G Schwartz, Lami Yeo, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Sonia S Hassan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is an association between cervical strain, evaluated using ultrasound elastography, and spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD) <37 weeks of gestation.
METHODS: One hundred and eighty nine (189) women at 16-24 weeks of gestation were evaluated. Ultrasound elastography was used to estimate cervical strain in three anatomical planes: one mid-sagittal in the same plane used for cervical length measurement, and two cross sectional images: one at the level of the internal cervical os, and the other at the level of the external cervical os. In each plane, two regions of interest (endocervix and entire cervix) were examined; a total of six regions of interest were evaluated.
RESULTS: The prevalence of sPTD was 11% (21/189). Strain values from each of the six cervical regions correlated weakly with cervical length (from r=-0.24, P<0.001 to r=-0.03, P=0.69). Strain measurements obtained in a cross sectional view of the internal cervical os were significantly associated with sPTD. Women with strain values ≤25th centile in the endocervical canal (0.19) and in the entire cervix (0.14) were 80% less likely to have a sPTD than women with strain values >25th centile [endocervical: odds ratio (OR) 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.96; entire cervix: OR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.9]. Additional adjustment for gestational age, race, smoking status, parity, maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and previous preterm delivery did not appreciably alter the magnitude or statistical significance of these associations. Strain values obtained from the external cervical os and from the sagittal view were not associated with sPTD.
CONCLUSION: Low strain values in the internal cervical os were associated with a significantly lower risk of spontaneous preterm delivery <37 weeks of gestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24356388      PMCID: PMC4183449          DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  130 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Clinical significance of early (< 20 weeks) vs. late (20-24 weeks) detection of sonographic short cervix in asymptomatic women in the mid-trimester.

Authors:  E Vaisbuch; R Romero; O Erez; J P Kusanovic; S Mazaki-Tovi; F Gotsch; V Romero; C Ward; T Chaiworapongsa; P Mittal; Y Sorokin; S S Hassan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts.

Authors:  R Ann Word; Xiang-Hong Li; Michael Hnat; Kelley Carrick
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment.

Authors:  E Celik; M To; K Gajewska; G C S Smith; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Quantitative imaging of the cervix: setting the bar.

Authors:  H Feltovich; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance.

Authors:  J D Iams; F F Johnson; J Sonek; L Sachs; C Gebauer; P Samuels
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Devender Roberts; Andrea L Jorgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

8.  Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study.

Authors:  Eduardo B da Fonseca; Roberto E Bittar; Mario H B Carvalho; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Authors:  O Okitsu; T Mimura; T Nakayama; T Aono
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Changes in the biochemical constituents and morphologic appearance of the human cervical stroma during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin Myers; Simona Socrate; Dimitrios Tzeranis; Michael House
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effect of depth on shear-wave elastography estimated in the internal and external cervical os during pregnancy.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Alma Aurioles-Garibay; Maynor Garcia; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse G Schwartz; Hyunyoung Ahn; Alicia Martinez-Varea; Lami Yeo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 2.  The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin M Myers; Helen Feltovich; Edoardo Mazza; Joy Vink; Michael Bajka; Ronald J Wapner; Timothy J Hall; Michael House
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery.

Authors:  K Köbbing; A Fruscalzo; K Hammer; M Möllers; M Falkenberg; R Kwiecien; W Klockenbusch; R Schmitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Edoardo Mazza; Helen Feltovich; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at ≤34 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Maynor Garcia; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Homam Saker; Lami Yeo; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.901

6.  Photoacoustic imaging of the uterine cervix to assess collagen and water content changes in murine pregnancy.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Maryam Basij; Amin Vossoughi Shahvari; Felipe Vadillo-Ortega; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero; Mohammad MehrMohammadi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Quantitative cervical elastography during pregnancy: influence of setting features on strain calculation.

Authors:  Arrigo Fruscalzo; Ambrogio P Londero; Ralf Schmitz
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 8.  Innovative methods of cervical assessment and potential for novel treatment.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich; Michael House
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 9.  New techniques in evaluation of the cervix.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich; Lindsey Carlson
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.300

10.  The Feasibility of Cervical Elastography in Predicting Preterm Delivery in Singleton Pregnancy with Short Cervix Following Progesterone Treatment.

Authors:  Yun Ji Jung; Hayan Kwon; Jeongeun Shin; Yejin Park; Seok-Jae Heo; Hyun Soo Park; Soo-Young Oh; Ji-Hee Sung; Hyun-Joo Seol; Hyun Mi Kim; Won Joon Seong; Han Sung Hwang; Inkyung Jung; Ja-Young Kwon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.