Literature DB >> 26571162

Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.

Brian J Neuman1, Christine Baldus, Lukas P Zebala, Michael P Kelly, Christopher Shaffrey, Charles Edwards, Tyler Koski, Frank Schwab, Steven Glassman, Stefan Parent, Stephen Lewis, Lawrence G Lenke, Jacob M Buchowski, Justin S Smith, Charles H Crawford, Han Jo Kim, Virginia Lafage, Jon Lurie, Leah Carreon, Keith H Bridwell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study with randomized and observational cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine baseline variables affecting adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) decision making to participate in randomization (RAND), observational nonsurgical (OBS-NS), or observational surgical (OBS-S) cohorts. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multiple factors play a key role in a patient's decision to be randomized or to choose an OBS-NS or OBS-S course for ASLS. Studies evaluating these factors are limited.
METHODS: Eligible candidates (patients with ASLS and no prior spinal fusion deformity surgery) from 9 centers participated in a RAND, OBS-NS, or OBS-S cohort study. Baseline variables (demographics, socioeconomics, patient-reported outcomes [PROs], Functional Treadmill Test, radiographs) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-five patients were enrolled: 67 RAND, 115 OBS-NS, 113 OBS-S. Subanalysis of older patients (60-80 years) found 54% of OBS-NS had college degrees compared with 82% of RAND and 71% of OBS-S (P = 0.010). Patients deciding to be part of a RAND cohort have similar clinical characteristics to the OBS-S cohort. OBS-S had more symptomatic spinal stenosis (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.029) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of PROs (Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS 6.3 vs. 5.5, P = 0.007]; Scoliosis Research Society [SRS] Pain [2.8 vs. 3.0, P = 0.018], Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.019] and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.002]; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [36.9 vs. 31.8, P = 0.029]; post-Treadmill back [5.8 vs. 4.4, P = 0.002] and leg [4.3 vs. 3.1, P = 0.037] pain NRS and larger lumbar coronal Cobb angles (56.5 degrees vs. 48.8 degrees, P < 0.001). RAND had more baseline motor deficits (10.4% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.036) and worse scores than OBS-NS on the basis of ODI (38.8 vs. 31.8, P = 0.006), SRS Function [3.1 vs. 3.4, P = 0.034], and Self-Image [2.7 vs. 3.1, P = 0.007].
CONCLUSION: Patients with worse PROs, more back pain, more back and leg pain with ambulation, and larger lumbar Cobb angles are more inclined to select surgical over nonsurgical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26571162      PMCID: PMC4792651          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Rolando M Puno; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; John R Johnson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Sigurd Berven; John Kostuik; John R Dimar; William C Horton; Keith Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Frank J Schwab; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen L Ondra; Sigurd Berven; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Keith Bridwell; Sigurd Berven; Steven Glassman; John Harrast; William Horton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Sigurd Berven; Keith Bridwell; William Horton; John R Dimar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: why patients enter a clinical trial.

Authors:  F W Verheggen; F Nieman; R Jonkers
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1998-10

7.  Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Sigurd Berven; Steven Glassman; Christopher Hamill; William C Horton; Lawrence G Lenke; Frank Schwab; Christine Baldus; Michael Shainline
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Charles C Edwards; Keith H Bridwell; Alpesh Patel; Anthony S Rinella; Annette Berra; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Sigurd Berven; Charles Edwards; Steven Glassman; Christopher Hamill; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The factors that play a role in the decision-making process of adult deformity patients.

Authors:  Murat Pekmezci; Sigurd H Berven; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Scoliosis surgery in adulthood: what challenges for what outcome?

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Yves Ntilikina
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

Review 3.  The importance of sagittal balance in adult scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

4.  Adult Congenital Spine Deformity: Clinical Features and Motivations for Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo; José Sánchez-Márquez; Gloria Talavera; Ibrahim Obeid; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstück; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  Decision-making factors in the treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predictive factors for successful non-operative treatment and achieving MCID improvement in health-related quality of life in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Hei Lung Wong; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.