Literature DB >> 19365250

The factors that play a role in the decision-making process of adult deformity patients.

Murat Pekmezci1, Sigurd H Berven, Serena S Hu, Vedat Deviren.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors that may affect the decision-making process of adult deformity patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adult deformity is a significant cause of morbidity in the elderly population. Despite high complication rates a significant number of patients still prefer operative treatment. Analysis of the factors that drive these patients to operative treatment would help surgeons to better evaluate these patients.
METHODS: Adult deformity patients who are evaluated in a single institute were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were being >18 years old, having a coronal curve magnitude of >30 degrees , having no previous surgery or associated neuromuscular or inflammatory condition, having completed SF-12, SRS-30, and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires in the initial visit, and having a complete set of radiographs. The demographic data as well as back and leg pain incidences and magnitudes were collected. The eligible patients were compared first as age-gender-curve type matched cohorts.
RESULTS: Functional domain scores particularly walking in Oswestry Disability Index and vitality in the SRS-30 were significantly worse in the operative treatment group, whereas the pain scores were similar in both groups in all outcomes assessment questionnaires. Besides, there was no difference among 2 groups with respect to either the incidence or the magnitude of back or leg pain.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that functional limitations are more important than pain for adult deformity patients when deciding for operative or nonoperative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19365250     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181851ba6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Shian Liu; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Gregory Mundis; Richard Hostin; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Munish Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Factors associated with having an indication for surgery in adult spinal deformity: an international european multicentre study.

Authors:  S Richner-Wunderlin; A F Mannion; A Vila-Casademunt; F Pellise; M Serra-Burriel; B Seifert; E Aghayev; E Acaroglu; A Alanay; F J S Pérez-Grueso; I Obeid; F Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score : Part 1: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients below 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Sigurd H Berven; Steven J Kamper; Niccole M Germscheid; Benny Dahl; Christopher I Shaffrey; Lawrence G Lenke; Stephen J Lewis; Kenneth M Cheung; Ahmet Alanay; Manabu Ito; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Improvement of spinal alignment and quality of life after corrective surgery for spinal kyphosis in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study with non-operated patients.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; M Hongo; T Kobayashi; T Abe; E Abe; Y Shimada
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Patients with spinal deformity over the age of 75: a retrospective analysis of operative versus non-operative management.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Justin K Scheer; Alp Yurter; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage; Eric Klineberg; Munish Gupta; Robert Eastlack; Gregory M Mundis; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Donald Blaskiewicz; Han Jo Kim; Tyler Koski; Khaled Kebaish; Christopher I Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Brian J Neuman; Christine Baldus; Lukas P Zebala; Michael P Kelly; Christopher Shaffrey; Charles Edwards; Tyler Koski; Frank Schwab; Steven Glassman; Stefan Parent; Stephen Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke; Jacob M Buchowski; Justin S Smith; Charles H Crawford; Han Jo Kim; Virginia Lafage; Jon Lurie; Leah Carreon; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Decision-making factors in the treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.