Literature DB >> 15371700

Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis.

Charles C Edwards1, Keith H Bridwell, Alpesh Patel, Anthony S Rinella, Annette Berra, Lawrence G Lenke.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A matched cohort analysis of long adult deformity fusions according to distal fusion level (L5 vs. S1). OBJECTIVE.: To compare the results of long adult deformity fusions to either L5 or the sacrum in the presence of a "healthy" 5-1 disc using a matched cohort analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For adult spinal deformity, the decision often arises whether to terminate a long fusion at L5 or the sacrum. The decision is especially challenging in the presence of a "healthy" (Grade 0 to 1 degeneration) 5-1 disc.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 95 adult deformity patients that underwent fusion from the thoracic spine to either L5 or the sacrum were sorted according to five preoperative criteria: 5-1 disc status, patient age, smoking status, number of levels fused, and sagittal balance. Two cohorts (L5, 27 patients; sacrum, 12 patients) were precisely matched according to the five criteria. Patients were evaluated at 2-year minimum follow-up according to radiographic data, complications, and SRS-24 outcomes.
RESULTS: Correction of sagittal imbalance was superior for sacrum patients (C7 plumb line: L5, 0.9 cm; sacrum, 3.2 cm; P = 0.03). At latest follow-up (L5, 5.2 years; sacrum, 3.7 years), 67% of L5 patients had radiographic evidence of advanced 5-1 disc degeneration and the L5 cohort tended to have inferior sagittal balance (C7 plumb line: L5, +4.0 cm; sacrum, +1.2 cm; P = 0.06). The sacrum cohort, however, required more surgical procedures (L5, 1.7; sacrum, 2.8; P = 0.03) and experienced a greater frequency of major complications (L5, 22%; sacrum, 75%; P = 0.02), including nonunion (L5, 4%; sacrum, 42%; P = 0.006) and medical morbidity (L5, 0%; sacrum, 33%; P = 0.001). SRS-24 scores reflected a similar patient assessment of outcome and function for the two cohorts (L5, 89; sacrum, 87). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: At 3 to 5 years' mean follow-up, long adult fusions to the sacrum required more procedures and had a higher frequency of complications than similar fusions to L5. For fusions to L5, subsequent subjacent disc degeneration is common and may be associated with a forward shift in sagittal balance. The ultimate influence of these factors on long-term outcomes remains to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371700     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138272.54896.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  52 in total

1.  A radiological evaluation of the morphometry and safety of S1, S2 and S2-ilium screws in the Asian population using three dimensional computed tomography scan: an analysis of 180 pelvis.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Amit Jeffry; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Lim Beng Saw
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Qingan Zhu; Eyal Itshayek; Claire F Jones; Timothy Schwab; Chadwick R Larson; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect of corrective long spinal fusion to the ilium on physical function in patients with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ryo Kondo; Yu Yamato; Tetsuyuki Nagafusa; Takashi Mizushima; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Sho Kobayashi; Daisuke Togawa; Shin Oe; Kenta Kurosu; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of inpatient morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Nancy Worley; Bryan Marascalchi; Cyrus M Jalai; Sun Yang; Bassel Diebo; Shaleen Vira; Anthony Boniello; Virginie Lafage; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for medical complications after long-level internal fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Xi-Nuo Zhang; Xiang-Yao Sun; Xiang-Long Meng; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Robotic versus freehand S2 alar iliac fixation: in-depth technical considerations.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Jamal N Shillingford; Joshua S Meredith; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman; Jeffrey L Gum
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

8.  Posterior second sacral alar iliac screw insertion: anatomic study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  F Zhu; H D Bao; S Yuan; B Wang; J Qiao; Z Z Zhu; Z Liu; Y T Ding; Y Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) in the Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine: Technical Report and Early Outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis S Meredith; Christopher K Kepler; Russel C Huang; Vishal V Hegde
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-01-25

10.  Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Brian J Neuman; Christine Baldus; Lukas P Zebala; Michael P Kelly; Christopher Shaffrey; Charles Edwards; Tyler Koski; Frank Schwab; Steven Glassman; Stefan Parent; Stephen Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke; Jacob M Buchowski; Justin S Smith; Charles H Crawford; Han Jo Kim; Virginia Lafage; Jon Lurie; Leah Carreon; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.