Literature DB >> 17728681

The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Keith H Bridwell1, Sigurd Berven, Charles Edwards, Steven Glassman, Christopher Hamill, Frank Schwab.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: : Assessment of peer-reviewed literature and personal experience with publications and grant organization.
OBJECTIVE: : This is an analysis of the current status of evidence-based medicine for primary adult spinal deformity to answer the question of whether surgical treatment benefits patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: : A limited number of evidence-based studies have been performed for primary adult scoliosis and spinal deformity surgery. None of these studies is ideal.
METHODS: : This is an assessment of current literature and study group methodology in an attempt to provide an evidence-based medicine approach for the study of primary presentation adult scoliosis and related spinal deformity.
RESULTS: : Many reasonable studies exist; however, there are no current definitive studies that answer the question posed above. There are many obstacles, both financial and organizational, to producing an "ideal" study. Most smaller studies suggest that surgical treatment of primary adult scoliosis benefits the patient. However, there is no multicenter prospective randomized study to answer this question.
CONCLUSION: : A multicenter funded study is needed to answer appropriate questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17728681     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453e22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Short segment treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis with TLIF L3/L4.

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The impact of lumbar scoliosis on pain, function and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Julio Espinosa; Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Carlos Cabello
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Brian J Neuman; Christine Baldus; Lukas P Zebala; Michael P Kelly; Christopher Shaffrey; Charles Edwards; Tyler Koski; Frank Schwab; Steven Glassman; Stefan Parent; Stephen Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke; Jacob M Buchowski; Justin S Smith; Charles H Crawford; Han Jo Kim; Virginia Lafage; Jon Lurie; Leah Carreon; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Adult degenerative scoliosis: comparison of patient-rated outcome after three different surgical treatments.

Authors:  F S Kleinstueck; T F Fekete; D Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Do benefits overcome the risks related to surgery for adult scoliosis? A detailed analysis of a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti Bròdano; Silvia Terzi; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Stefano Bandiera; Christiano Simoes; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Matteo Palmisani; Eugen Dema; Stefano Cervellati
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long vs. short fusions for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: does balance matters?

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Alberto Di Martino; Raffaele Borghi; Fabrizio Perna; Angelo Toscano; Francesco Traina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Classification of Adult Spinal Deformity: Review of Current Concepts and Future Directions.

Authors:  Laxmikant Dagdia; Terufumi Kokabu; Manabu Ito
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-05-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.