Literature DB >> 15770185

Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis.

Steven D Glassman1, Sigurd Berven, Keith Bridwell, William Horton, John R Dimar.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of the initial enrollment data from a prospective multicentered study of adult spinal deformity.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to correlate radiographic measures of deformity with patient-based outcome measures in adult scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies of adult scoliosis have attempted to correlate radiographic appearance and clinical symptoms, but it has proven difficult to predict health status based on radiographic measures of deformity alone. The ability to correlate radiographic measures of deformity with symptoms would be useful for decision-making and surgical planning.
METHODS: The study correlates radiographic measures of deformity with scores on the Short Form-12, Scoliosis Research Society-29, and Oswestry profiles. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to an established positioning protocol for anteroposterior and lateral 36-inch standing radiographs. Radiographic parameters studied were curve type, curve location, curve magnitude, coronal balance, sagittal balance, apical rotation, and rotatory subluxation.
RESULTS: The 298 patients studied include 172 with no prior surgery and 126 who had undergone prior spine fusion. Positive sagittal balance was the most reliable predictor of clinical symptoms in both patient groups. Thoracolumbar and lumbar curves generated less favorable scores than thoracic curves in both patient groups. Significant coronal imbalance of greater than 4 cm was associated with deterioration in pain and function scores for unoperated patients but not in patients with previous surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that restoration of a more normal sagittal balance is the critical goal for any reconstructive spine surgery. The study suggests that magnitude of coronal deformity and extent of coronal correction are less critical parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770185     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  239 in total

1.  Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance.

Authors:  Mourad Ould-Slimane; Thibaut Lenoir; Cyril Dauzac; Ludovic Rillardon; Etienne Hoffmann; Pierre Guigui; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A comparative study of axis-line-distance technique and Cobb method on assessing the curative effect on scoliosis.

Authors:  Jia-Wei He; Guang-Hui Bai; Xin-Jian Ye; Kun Liu; Zhi-Han Yan; Xian Zhang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yi-Xing Huang; Zhi-Kang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Computer modeling of selected projectional factors of the 84-in focal film distance anteroposterior full spine radiograph compared with 40-in focal film distance sectional views.

Authors:  Roger R Coleman; Mark A Lopes; Rick A Suttles
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-01-21

4.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

6.  Postural spinal balance defined by net intersegmental moments: Results of a biomechanical approach and experimental errors measurement.

Authors:  Benjamin Blondel; Elke Viehweger; Bertrand Moal; Patrick Tropiano; Jean-Luc Jouve; Virginie Lafage; Raphael Dumas; Stéphane Fuentes; Gérard Bollini; Vincent Pomero
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 7.  Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning.

Authors:  Bassel Diebo; Shian Liu; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-11

8.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.