Literature DB >> 29603012

Decision-making factors in the treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Takashi Fujishiro1,2, Louis Boissière3, Derek Thomas Cawley3, Daniel Larrieu3, Olivier Gille3, Jean-Marc Vital3, Ferran Pellisé4, Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso5, Frank Kleinstück6, Emre Acaroglu7, Ahmet Alanay8, Ibrahim Obeid3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to elucidate the factors for the decision-making process in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD), including sagittal parameters, that impact health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
METHODS: A multicenter prospective ASD database was retrospectively reviewed. The demographic data, HRQOL, and radiographic measures were analyzed using multivariate analyses in younger (≤ 50 years) and older (> 50 years) age groups.
RESULTS: This study included 414 patients (134 surgical and 280 nonsurgical; mean age 30.7 years) in the younger age group and 575 patients (323 surgical and 252 nonsurgical; mean age 65.8 years) in the older age group. Worse HRQOL measures drove surgical treatment, both in younger and older patients. The SRS-22 self-image score was the most differentiating domain, both in the younger and older age groups, and an additional significant factor in the older age group was pain and disability. Coronal deformity drove surgical treatment for the younger age group; however, older surgical patients were less likely to have coronal malalignment. Sagittal parameters were associated with the decision-making process. Greater pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch in the younger age group and smaller lumbar lordosis index in the older age group were most correlated with the decision to undergo surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Aside from the HRQOL measures and coronal deformity, sagittal parameters were identified as significant factors for the decision-making process in the ASD population, and the lack of lumbar lordosis in relation to pelvic incidence was a strong driver to pursue surgical treatment. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Decision-making process; Sagittal parameter; Scoliosis; Surgical indication; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603012     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5572-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

Review 1.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning.

Authors:  I Obeid; L Boissière; C Yilgor; D Larrieu; F Pellisé; A Alanay; E Acaroglu; F J Perez-Grueso; F Kleinstück; J M Vital; A Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Sigurd H Berven; Steven J Kamper; Niccole M Germscheid; Benny Dahl; Christopher I Shaffrey; Lawrence G Lenke; Stephen J Lewis; Kenneth M Cheung; Ahmet Alanay; Manabu Ito; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Sigurd Berven; Steven Glassman; Christopher Hamill; William C Horton; Lawrence G Lenke; Frank Schwab; Christine Baldus; Michael Shainline
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Patient Factors That Influence Decision Making: Randomization Versus Observational Nonoperative Versus Observational Operative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Brian J Neuman; Christine Baldus; Lukas P Zebala; Michael P Kelly; Christopher Shaffrey; Charles Edwards; Tyler Koski; Frank Schwab; Steven Glassman; Stefan Parent; Stephen Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke; Jacob M Buchowski; Justin S Smith; Charles H Crawford; Han Jo Kim; Virginia Lafage; Jon Lurie; Leah Carreon; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients.

Authors:  Shay Bess; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Doug Burton; Matthew Cunningham; Chris Shaffrey; Alexis Shelokov; Richard Hostin; Frank Schwab; Kirkham Wood; Behrooz Akbarnia
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Nicola Hawkinson; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The factors that play a role in the decision-making process of adult deformity patients.

Authors:  Murat Pekmezci; Sigurd H Berven; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort.

Authors:  Jamie Terran; Frank Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Pierre Devos; Christopher P Ames; Kai-Ming G Fu; Douglas Burton; Richard Hostin; Eric Klineberg; Munish Gupta; Vedat Deviren; Gregory Mundis; Robert Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Analysis of the reliability of surgeons' ability to differentiate between idiopathic and degenerative spinal deformity in adults radiologically. What descriptive parameters help them decide?

Authors:  Umit Ozgur Guler; Selcen Yuksel; Sule Yakici; Montserrat Domingo-Sabat; Ferran Pellise; Francisco J S Pérez-Grueso; Ibrahim Obeid; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  7 in total

1.  Factors associated with having an indication for surgery in adult spinal deformity: an international european multicentre study.

Authors:  S Richner-Wunderlin; A F Mannion; A Vila-Casademunt; F Pellise; M Serra-Burriel; B Seifert; E Aghayev; E Acaroglu; A Alanay; F J S Pérez-Grueso; I Obeid; F Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score : Part 1: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients below 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Louis Boissière; Derek Thomas Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Multiple-rod constructs in adult spinal deformity surgery for pelvic-fixated long instrumentations: an integral matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Guevara-Villazón; Louis Boissiere; Kazunori Hayashi; Daniel Larrieu; Soufiane Ghailane; Jean-Marc Vital; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Ibrahim Obeid; Anouar Bourghli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Mental health status and sagittal spinopelvic alignment correlate with self-image in patients with adult spinal deformity before and after corrective surgery.

Authors:  Kazunori Hayashi; Louis Boissière; Fernando Guevara-Villazón; Daniel Larrieu; Anouar Bourghli; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre Acaroğlu; Ahmet Alanay; Hiroaki Nakamura; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Toward the Development of a Comprehensive Clinically Oriented Patient Profile: A Systematic Review of the Purpose, Characteristic, and Methodological Quality of Classification Systems of Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Kenny Yat Hong Kwan; J Naresh-Babu; Wilco Jacobs; Marinus de Kleuver; David W Polly; Caglar Yilgor; Yabin Wu; Jong-Beom Park; Manabu Ito; Miranda L van Hooff
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  The effect of pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of severe Scheuermann thoracolumbar kyphosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment.

Authors:  Guanfeng Lin; Shengru Wang; Yang Yang; Zhe Su; You Du; Xiaolin Xu; Xiran Chai; Yipeng Wang; Bin Yu; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.