Literature DB >> 26555756

Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception.

Robert L Whitwell1, Gavin Buckingham2, James T Enns3, Philippe A Chouinard4,5, Melvyn A Goodale5,6,7.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that pictorial illusions have a smaller influence on grasping than they do on perceptual judgments. Yet to date this work has not considered the reduced influence of an illusion as it is measured repeatedly. Here we studied this decrement in the context of a Ponzo illusion to further characterize the dissociation between vision for perception and for action. Participants first manually estimated the lengths of single targets in a Ponzo display with their thumb and index finger, then actually grasped these targets in another series of trials, and then manually estimated the target lengths again in a final set of trials. The results showed that although the perceptual estimates and grasp apertures were equally sensitive to real differences in target length on the initial trials, only the perceptual estimates remained biased by the illusion over repeated measurements. In contrast, the illusion's effect on the grasps decreased rapidly, vanishing entirely after only a few trials. Interestingly, a closer examination of the grasp data revealed that this initial effect was driven largely by undersizing the grip aperture for the display configuration in which the target was positioned between the diverging background lines (i.e., when the targets appeared to be shorter than they really were). This asymmetry between grasping apparently shorter and longer targets suggests that the sensorimotor system may initially treat the edges of the configuration as obstacles to be avoided. This finding highlights the sensorimotor system's ability to rapidly update motor programs through error feedback, manifesting as an immunity to the effects of illusion displays even after only a few trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action; Error minimization; Grasping; Haptic feedback; Illusion decrement; Motor learning; Perception; Ponzo illusion; Sensorimotor; Two-visual-systems hypothesis; Visual feedback; Visuomotor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26555756     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0975-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  V H Franz; K R Gegenfurtner; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

3.  The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian; V L Coppard; R G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points?

Authors:  D Voudouris; J B J Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 6.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Maurice A Smith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.

Authors:  A M Haffenden; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.

Authors:  Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Riemannian Geometry Theory of Synergy Selection for Visually-Guided Movement.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson; Robin T Bye
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

2.  The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Grasping movements toward seen and handheld objects.

Authors:  Ivan Camponogara; Robert Volcic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Grasping of Real-World Objects Is Not Biased by Ensemble Perception.

Authors:  Annabel Wing-Yan Fan; Lin Lawrence Guo; Adam Frost; Robert L Whitwell; Matthias Niemeier; Jonathan S Cant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-12

6.  The Riemannian Geometry Theory of Visually-Guided Movement Accounts for Afterimage Illusions and Size Constancy.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson; Robin T Bye
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

7.  Why some size illusions affect grip aperture.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Erik Kleijn; Marlijn van der Meijden; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.