Literature DB >> 34070234

A Riemannian Geometry Theory of Synergy Selection for Visually-Guided Movement.

Peter D Neilson1, Megan D Neilson2, Robin T Bye3.   

Abstract

Bringing together a Riemannian geometry account of visual space with a complementary account of human movement synergies we present a neurally-feasible computational formulation of visuomotor task performance. This cohesive geometric theory addresses inherent nonlinear complications underlying the match between a visual goal and an optimal action to achieve that goal: (i) the warped geometry of visual space causes the position, size, outline, curvature, velocity and acceleration of images to change with changes in the place and orientation of the head, (ii) the relationship between head place and body posture is ill-defined, and (iii) mass-inertia loads on muscles vary with body configuration and affect the planning of minimum-effort movement. We describe a partitioned visuospatial memory consisting of the warped posture-and-place-encoded images of the environment, including images of visible body parts. We depict synergies as low-dimensional submanifolds embedded in the warped posture-and-place manifold of the body. A task-appropriate synergy corresponds to a submanifold containing those postures and places that match the posture-and-place-encoded visual images that encompass the required visual goal. We set out a reinforcement learning process that tunes an error-reducing association memory network to minimize any mismatch, thereby coupling visual goals with compatible movement synergies. A simulation of a two-degrees-of-freedom arm illustrates that, despite warping of both visual space and posture space, there exists a smooth one-to-one and onto invertible mapping between vision and proprioception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Riemannian geometry; behavioral goals; computational model; movement synergies; nonlinear dynamics; posture-and-place-encoded memory; reinforcement learning; stereopsis; visual space; visually-guided movement

Year:  2021        PMID: 34070234      PMCID: PMC8163178          DOI: 10.3390/vision5020026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision (Basel)        ISSN: 2411-5150


  73 in total

Review 1.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  The BUMP model of response planning: intermittent predictive control accounts for 10 Hz physiological tremor.

Authors:  Robin T Bye; Peter D Neilson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  An overview of adaptive model theory: solving the problems of redundancy, resources, and nonlinear interactions in human movement control.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Visual space under free viewing conditions.

Authors:  Michelle J A Doumen; Astrid M L Kappers; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

5.  Perceived size and distance in visual space.

Authors:  A S GILINSKY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Vision and Action.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 7.  The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy).

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distinguishing informational from value-related encoding of rewarding and punishing outcomes in the human brain.

Authors:  Ryan K Jessup; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Is perceptual space inherently non-Euclidean?

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception despite control for the litany of past confounds.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale; Kate E Merritt; James T Enns
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Riemannian Geometry Theory of Visually-Guided Movement Accounts for Afterimage Illusions and Size Constancy.

Authors:  Peter D Neilson; Megan D Neilson; Robin T Bye
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.