Literature DB >> 9526087

The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.

A M Haffenden1, M A Goodale.   

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of a size-contrast illusion (Ebbinghaus or Titchener Circles Illusion) on visual perception and the visual control of grasping movements. Seventeen right-handed participants picked up and, on other trials, estimated the size of "poker-chip" disks, which functioned as the target circles in a three-dimensional version of the illusion. In the estimation condition, subjects indicated how big they thought the target was by separating their thumb and forefinger to match the target's size. After initial viewing, no visual feedback from the hand or the target was available. Scaling of grip aperture was found to be strongly correlated with the physical size of the disks, while manual estimations of disk size were biased in the direction of the illusion. Evidently, grip aperture is calibrated to the true size of an object, even when perception of object size is distorted by a pictorial illusion, a result that is consistent with recent suggestions that visually guided prehension and visual perception are mediated by separate visual pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9526087     DOI: 10.1162/089892998563824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  73 in total

1.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The attentional repulsion effect in perception and action.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Christina Rival; Isabelle Olivier; Hadrien Ceyte; Carole Ferrel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.