Literature DB >> 18629739

Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.

Volker H Franz1, Karl R Gegenfurtner.   

Abstract

The finding that the Ebbinghaus/Titchener illusion deceives perception but not grasping is usually seen as strong evidence for Goodale and Milner's (1992) notion of two parallel visual systems, one being conscious and deceived by the illusion (vision-for-perception) and the other being unconscious and not deceived (vision-for-action). However, this finding is controversial and led to studies with seemingly contradictory results. We argue that these results are not as contradictory as it might seem. Instead, studies consistently show similar effects of the illusion on grasping. The perceptual effects are strongly dependent on the specific perceptual measure employed. If, however, some methodological precautions are used, then these diverse perceptual results can be reconciled and point to a single internal size estimate that is used for perception and for grasping. This suggests that the Ebbinghaus illusion deceives a common representation of object size that is used by perception and action.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18629739     DOI: 10.1080/02643290701862449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  33 in total

1.  Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; James Danckert; Britt Anderson; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Britt Anderson; James Danckert; Barbara Frühholz; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Gavin Buckingham; James T Enns; Philippe A Chouinard; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

6.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Mind and movement.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-08

8.  Visual stability.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Garner-Interference in left-handed awkward grasping.

Authors:  Owino Eloka; Felix Feuerhake; Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Visuomotor crowding: the resolution of grasping in cluttered scenes.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; Robert B Post; David Whitney
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.