Literature DB >> 11355394

The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements.

M Mon-Williams1, J R Tresilian, V L Coppard, R G Carson.   

Abstract

Numerous everyday tasks require the nervous system to program a prehensile movement towards a target object positioned in a cluttered environment. Adult humans are extremely proficient in avoiding contact with any non-target objects (obstacles) whilst carrying out such movements. A number of recent studies have highlighted the importance of considering the control of reach-to-grasp (prehension) movements in the presence of such obstacles. The current study was constructed with the aim of beginning the task of studying the relative impact on prehension as the position of obstacles is varied within the workspace. The experimental design ensured that the obstacles were positioned within the workspace in locations where they did not interfere physically with the path taken by the hand when no obstacle was present. In all positions, the presence of an obstacle caused the hand to slow down and the maximum grip aperture to decrease. Nonetheless, the effect of the obstacle varied according to its position within the workspace. In the situation where an obstacle was located a small distance to the right of a target object, the obstacle showed a large effect on maximum grip aperture but a relatively small effect on movement time. In contrast, an object positioned in front and to the right of a target object had a large effect on movement speed but a relatively small effect on maximum grip aperture. It was found that the presence of two obstacles caused the system to decrease further the movement speed and maximum grip aperture. The position of the two obstacles dictated the extent to which their presence affected the movement parameters. These results show that the anticipated likelihood of a collision with potential obstacles affects the planning of movement duration and maximum grip aperture in prehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11355394     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Alice C Roy; Silvia Stefanini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Nicolò Francesco Bernardi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Gavin Buckingham; James T Enns; Philippe A Chouinard; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

4.  Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

Authors:  William H Gage; Karl F Zabjek; Stephen W Hill; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Why does an obstacle just below the digits' paths not influence a grasping movement while an obstacle to the side of their paths does?

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated according to movement duration in prehension.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Christopher J Worssam; Lewis C Meade; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visuomotor crowding: the resolution of grasping in cluttered scenes.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; Robert B Post; David Whitney
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.