AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare dosimetrically the manual optimisation with IPSA using dose volume histograms (DVH) among patients treated for carcinoma of cervix with intracavitary brachytherapy. BACKGROUND: With the advent of advanced imaging modalities, there has been a shift from conventional X-ray based planning to three-dimensional planning. Manual optimisation is widely used across various institutions but it is time consuming and operator dependant. Inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) is now available in various brachytherapy planning systems. But there is a paucity of studies comparing manual optimisation and IPSA in treatment of carcinoma cervix with intracavitary brachytherapy and hence this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients treated between December 2013 and March 2014 with intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of cervix were selected for this study. All patients were initially treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. The DVH was evaluated and compared between manually optimised plans and IPSA in the same set of patients. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the HRCTV coverage, mean V100 of 87.75% and 82.37% (p = 0.001) and conformity index 0.67 and 0.6 (p = 0.007) for plans generated using IPSA and manual optimisation, respectively. Homogeneity index and dose to the OARs remained similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of inverse planning in intracavitary brachytherapy of cervix has shown a significant improvement in the target volume coverage when compared with manual planning.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare dosimetrically the manual optimisation with IPSA using dose volume histograms (DVH) among patients treated for carcinoma of cervix with intracavitary brachytherapy. BACKGROUND: With the advent of advanced imaging modalities, there has been a shift from conventional X-ray based planning to three-dimensional planning. Manual optimisation is widely used across various institutions but it is time consuming and operator dependant. Inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) is now available in various brachytherapy planning systems. But there is a paucity of studies comparing manual optimisation and IPSA in treatment of carcinoma cervix with intracavitary brachytherapy and hence this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients treated between December 2013 and March 2014 with intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of cervix were selected for this study. All patients were initially treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. The DVH was evaluated and compared between manually optimised plans and IPSA in the same set of patients. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the HRCTV coverage, mean V100 of 87.75% and 82.37% (p = 0.001) and conformity index 0.67 and 0.6 (p = 0.007) for plans generated using IPSA and manual optimisation, respectively. Homogeneity index and dose to the OARs remained similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of inverse planning in intracavitary brachytherapy of cervix has shown a significant improvement in the target volume coverage when compared with manual planning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carcinoma cervix; High dose rate; Inverse planning; Manual Optimisation
Authors: I Barillot; J C Horiot; P Maingon; G Truc; G Chaplain; J Comte; J P Brenier Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bernard Lachance; Dominic Béliveau-Nadeau; Etienne Lessard; Mario Chrétien; I Chow Joe Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Luc Beaulieu; Eric Vigneault Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Richard Pötter; Christine Haie-Meder; Erik Van Limbergen; Isabelle Barillot; Marisol De Brabandere; Johannes Dimopoulos; Isabelle Dumas; Beth Erickson; Stefan Lang; An Nulens; Peter Petrow; Jason Rownd; Christian Kirisits Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Kelly D Dewitt; I Chow Joe Hsu; Joycelyn Speight; Vivian K Weinberg; Etienne Lessard; Jean Pouliot Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Akila N Viswanathan; Johannes Dimopoulos; Christian Kirisits; Daniel Berger; Richard Pötter Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-02-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Arun George Paul; Adrian Nalichowski; Judith Abrams; Peter Paximadis; Ling Zhuang; Steven Miller Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2018-06-28