Literature DB >> 12419454

Inverse planning for interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy: truly anatomy-based planning.

Etienne Lessard1, I-Chow Hsu, Jean Pouliot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Commercially available optimization schemes generally result in an undesirable dose distribution, because of the particular shapes of tumors extending laterally from the tandem. Dose distribution is therefore manually obtained by adjusting relative dwell time values until an acceptable solution is found. The objective of this work is to present the clinical application of an inverse planning dose optimization tool for the automatic determination of source dwell time values in the treatment of interstitial gynecologic templates. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In cases where the tumor extends beyond the range of the tandem-ovoid applicator, catheters as well as the tandem are inserted into the paravaginal and parametrial region in an attempt to cover the tumor volume. CT scans of these patients are then used for CT-based dose planning. Dose distribution is obtained manually by varying the relative dwell times until adequate dose coverage is achieved. This manual planning is performed by an experienced physician. In parallel, our in-house inverse planning based on simulated annealing is used to automatically determine which of all possible dwell positions will become active and to calculate the dwell time values needed to fulfill dose constraints applied to the tumor volume and to each organ at risk. To compare the results of these planning methods, dose-volume histograms and isodose distributions were generated for the target and each organ at risk.
RESULTS: This procedure has been applied for the dose planning of 12 consecutive interstitial gynecologic templates cases. For all cases, once the anatomy was contoured, the routine of inverse planning based on simulated annealing found the solution to the dose constraints within 1 min of CPU time. In comparison, manual planning took more than 45 min. The inverse planning-generated plans showed improved protection to organs at risk for the same coverage compared to manual planning.
CONCLUSION: This inverse planning tool reduced the planning time significantly and produced improved plans with reduced dose to the organs at risk. Furthermore, the inverse planning approach improves the physician's control over treatment. The focus becomes the physician's prescription to the target and his or her compromise due to dose to normal structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12419454     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03802-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Toward adaptive stereotactic robotic brachytherapy for prostate cancer: demonstration of an adaptive workflow incorporating inverse planning and an MR stealth robot.

Authors:  J Adam Cunha; I-Chow Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Mack Roach Iii; Katsuto Shinohara; John Kurhanewicz; Galen Reed; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.442

2.  Comparison of manual and inverse optimisation techniques in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer: A dosimetric study.

Authors:  Ram Abhinav Kannan; Janaki Manur Gururajachar; Arul Ponni; Kirthi Koushik; Mohan Kumar; Ram Charith Alva; Ritika Harjani; Arvind Murthy
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-06-26

3.  Is there a subset of patients with recurrent cancer in the vagina who are not candidates for interstitial brachytherapy that can be treated with multichannel vaginal brachytherapy using graphic optimization?

Authors:  Deepinder P Singh; Kevin C Bylund; Ahmad Matloubieh; Ali Mazloom; Alexander Gray; Ravinder Sidhu; Lucille Barrette; Yuhchyau Chen
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-04-28

4.  A detailed dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse plans in HDR intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Petra Trnková; Dimos Baltas; Andreas Karabis; Markus Stock; Johannes Dimopoulos; Dietmar Georg; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-01-14

5.  Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Optimization Algorithms Used in Interstitial Brachytherapy of Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shraddha Srivastava; Navin Singh; Varun Kumar Kashyap
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Does help structures play a role in reducing the variation of dwell time in IPSA planning for gynaecological brachytherapy application?

Authors:  Swamidas Jamema; Umesh Mahantshetty; Dd Deshpande; Smriti Sharma; Sk Shrivastava
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  Inverse planning for combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kotaro Yoshio; Naoya Murakami; Madoka Morota; Ken Harada; Mayuka Kitaguchi; Kentaro Yamagishi; Shuhei Sekii; Kana Takahashi; Koji Inaba; Hiroshi Mayahara; Yoshinori Ito; Minako Sumi; Susumu Kanazawa; Jun Itami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Dosimetric evaluation of multilumen intracavitary balloon applicator rotation in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; Mark G Trombetta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Bin Tang; Xiangyu Liu; Xianliang Wang; Shengwei Kang; Pei Wang; Jie Li; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-08-29

10.  Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Yingjie Xu; Jing Zuo; Jusheng An; Manni Huang; Xi Yang; Jiayun Chen; Hui Yan; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.