Literature DB >> 10924989

Impact on treatment outcome and late effects of customized treatment planning in cervix carcinomas: baseline results to compare new strategies.

I Barillot1, J C Horiot, P Maingon, G Truc, G Chaplain, J Comte, J P Brenier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the predictive factors of complications, to evaluate the impact of customized treatment planning on late normal tissue effects per stage, and to report disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) rates. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1970 to 1994, 642 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone for carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) substaging, 34% were Stage I, 39% Stage II, and 27% Stage III. The analysis was divided into three periods: 1970-1978 (use of standard prescriptions),1979-1984 (implementation of individual adjustments), 1985-1994 (systematic individual adjustments). Five-year DFS, LC, and complications rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive factors of complications were determined by univariate analysis using frequency tables and nonparametric t-tests. Multivariate analysis consisted of a polychotomous stepwise regression.
RESULTS: The comparison of the three time periods showed a significant reduction of the external radiation dose (dose above 40 Gy in 47% of patients before 1979 vs. 36% after 1984), of the use of parametrial boost (55% vs. 39%), of the use of vaginal cylinder (28% vs. 11.5%), and of the HWT volume (combined intracavitary and external irradiation) (842 cc vs. 503 cc on average). The total sequelae/complications rate, all toxicity grades, all stages, all organs was 51%. Five-year actuarial rate per toxicity grade was: G1, 42%; G2, 23.5%; G3, 10%; G4, 3%. The three main predictive factors for rectal and bladder sequelae/complications (all toxicity grades) taking into account time period were: the increase of external radiation dose, the high dose rate at reference points, and the whole vagina brachytherapy. No G4 occurred in the third period. The rate of G3 complications dropped from 16% to 6% over time: from 5% during the first period to 0% during the third period in Stage I, from 8% to 6% in Stage II, and from 23% to 12% in Stage III. G3 currently describes a variety of clinical situations with a different impact on quality of life which justifies further refinements of definitions of late effects. In our experience the severity of G3 markedly decreased: less than one-third of G3 had a real impact on quality of life in the last period compared to more than two-thirds in the first period. Meanwhile, 5-year LC rates remained stable in Stages I and II, 91% and 85% respectively. Conversely they fell from 75% to 55% in Stage III, thus raising the problem of underdosage and/or more accurate staging with time.
CONCLUSIONS: Customized treatment planning eradicated lethal complications and provided a significant decrease of G3 in all stages while maintaining high cure rates in early stages. Dose reduction should be considered with caution in Stage III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10924989     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00556-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  [Rectal toxicity prediction based on accurate rectal surface dose summation for cervical cancer radiotherapy].

Authors:  Jia-Wei Chen; Hai-Bin Chen; Qiang He; Yu-Liang Liao; Xin Zhen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

2.  Comparison of manual and inverse optimisation techniques in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer: A dosimetric study.

Authors:  Ram Abhinav Kannan; Janaki Manur Gururajachar; Arul Ponni; Kirthi Koushik; Mohan Kumar; Ram Charith Alva; Ritika Harjani; Arvind Murthy
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-06-26

3.  Evaluating the value of uPAR of serum and tissue on patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiexian Jing; Shumin Zheng; Cunzhi Han; Lili Du; Yongfeng Guo; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 4.  Brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: a review.

Authors:  Robyn Banerjee; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-28

5.  Radiation-induced expression of IER5 is dose-dependent and not associated with the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Min Shi; Ku-Ke Ding; Ping-Kun Zhou; Dong-Mei Guo; Dan Chen; Yan-Sha Li; Chun-Li Zhao; Chen-Chen Zhao; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Retrospective feasibility study of simultaneous integrated boost in cervical cancer using Tomotherapy: the impact of organ motion and tumor regression.

Authors:  Fernanda G Herrera; Sharon Callaway; Ela Delikgoz-Soykut; Mehtap Coskun; Laetitia Porta; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Joao Soares-Rodrigues; Leonie Heym; Raphael Moeckli; Mahmut Ozsahin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Definitive radiotherapy for uterine cervix cancer: long term results for patients treated in the period from 1998 till 2002 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana.

Authors:  Helena Barbara Zobec Logar; Barbara Segedin; Robert Hudej; Primoz Petric
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Inverse planning for combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kotaro Yoshio; Naoya Murakami; Madoka Morota; Ken Harada; Mayuka Kitaguchi; Kentaro Yamagishi; Shuhei Sekii; Kana Takahashi; Koji Inaba; Hiroshi Mayahara; Yoshinori Ito; Minako Sumi; Susumu Kanazawa; Jun Itami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Image guided radiation therapy boost in combination with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xianliang Wang; Jie Li; Pei Wang; Ke Yuan; Gang Yin; Bin Wan
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-04-14

10.  Dosimetric study for cervix carcinoma treatment using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compensation based on 3D intracavitary brachytherapy technique.

Authors:  Gang Yin; Pei Wang; Jinyi Lang; Yin Tian; Yangkun Luo; Zixuan Fan; Kin Yip Tam
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.