Ancuța Zazgyva1, Sándor-György Zuh2, Ciprian Oliviu Roman3, István Gergely3, Tudor Sorin Pop3. 1. Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mureș County Hospital, 31 Mihai Viteazul Street, Tîrgu Mureș, 540096, Romania. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology I, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Tîrgu Mureș, 31 Mihai Viteazul Street, Tîrgu Mureș, 540096, Romania. zuh.sandor@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology I, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Tîrgu Mureș, 31 Mihai Viteazul Street, Tîrgu Mureș, 540096, Romania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular reconstruction using a reinforcement device (RD) in combination with bone grafting in Paprosky type 2 and 3 acetabular bone defects. METHODS: Morselised bone grafts were used to fill cavitary defects and a structural graft placed in the superior part of the acetabulum in cases of cranial bone defects, with a proximally fixed RD (Protetim, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary) implanted in all cases. Construct stability, device positioning, hip centre of rotation and medial acetabular wall thickness were evaluated radiologically. Survival rates were estimated with aseptic loosening and revision for any reason as endpoints. RESULTS: The 28 patients (29 hips) were followed for 4.8 ± 2.7 years (range, 2-10.4 years). Hip centre of rotation was lowered in all cases, with no significant differences between the mean values obtained post-operatively and at the last follow-up. Medial acetabular wall thickness and RD abduction angle were maintained up to the last evaluation. Bone grafts integrated by two years post-operatively in the majority of cases. Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 85.2 % and 82.1 % for the two endpoints at ten years. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction using a proximally fixed RD in combination with bone grafting offered good mid-term results in the treatment of acetabular bone defects. In cases of severe bone loss, the structural allograft allowed placement of the RD with ischial contact, rendering survival rates similar to RDs with both iliac and ilioischial fixation. The technique was successful in restoring and maintaining medial acetabular bone stock and construct stability for up to ten years.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular reconstruction using a reinforcement device (RD) in combination with bone grafting in Paprosky type 2 and 3 acetabular bone defects. METHODS: Morselised bone grafts were used to fill cavitary defects and a structural graft placed in the superior part of the acetabulum in cases of cranial bone defects, with a proximally fixed RD (Protetim, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary) implanted in all cases. Construct stability, device positioning, hip centre of rotation and medial acetabular wall thickness were evaluated radiologically. Survival rates were estimated with aseptic loosening and revision for any reason as endpoints. RESULTS: The 28 patients (29 hips) were followed for 4.8 ± 2.7 years (range, 2-10.4 years). Hip centre of rotation was lowered in all cases, with no significant differences between the mean values obtained post-operatively and at the last follow-up. Medial acetabular wall thickness and RD abduction angle were maintained up to the last evaluation. Bone grafts integrated by two years post-operatively in the majority of cases. Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 85.2 % and 82.1 % for the two endpoints at ten years. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction using a proximally fixed RD in combination with bone grafting offered good mid-term results in the treatment of acetabular bone defects. In cases of severe bone loss, the structural allograft allowed placement of the RD with ischial contact, rendering survival rates similar to RDs with both iliac and ilioischial fixation. The technique was successful in restoring and maintaining medial acetabular bone stock and construct stability for up to ten years.
Entities:
Keywords:
Morselised bone grafts; Reinforcement device; Revision hip arthroplasty; Structural allograft
Authors: Max J Friedrich; Jan Schmolders; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Derek Bennett; Ronald E Delanois; Khaled J Saleh; Issada Thongtrangan; Michael Kuskowski; Edward Y Cheng; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi; James B Stiehl; Michael A Mont Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Vlad Alexandru Georgeanu; Octav Marius Russu; Bogdan Obada; Madalina-Gabriela Iliescu; Marius Nicolae Popescu; Dan Marcel Iliescu; Vlad Predescu Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Vlad Alexandru Georgeanu; Tudor Atasiei; Vlad Predescu; Nicolae Gheorghiu; Andrei Marian Feier; Octav Marius Russu Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 2.430