Literature DB >> 22816064

Reconstruction options for acetabular revision.

Erica D Taylor1, James A Browne.   

Abstract

This article summarizes reconstruction options available for acetabular revision following total hip arthroplasty. A thoughtful methodology to the evaluation and treatment of patients with implant failure after joint replacement is essential to guarantee accurate diagnoses, appropriate triage to reconstruction options, and optimal clinical outcomes. In the majority of patients who undergo acetabular revision, factors such as bone loss and pelvic discontinuity provide a challenge in the selection and implementation of the proper reconstruction option. With advanced evaluation algorithms, imaging techniques, and implant designs, techniques have evolved to rebuild the compromised acetabulum at the time of revision surgery. However, clinical outcomes data for these techniques continue to lag behind the exponential increase in revision hip arthroplasty cases predicted to occur over the next several years. We encourage those involved in the treatment of patients undergoing hip replacement surgery to participate in well-designed clinical studies to enhance evidence-based knowledge regarding revision acetabular reconstruction options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum; Arthoplasty; Hip; Revision; Tantalum

Year:  2012        PMID: 22816064      PMCID: PMC3399017          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i7.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  25 in total

1.  Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.

Authors:  M J Christie; S A Barrington; M F Brinson; M E Ruhling; D K DeBoer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.

Authors:  Eerik T Skyttä; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka O Paavolainen; Ville M Remes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Orthopaedics in 2020: predictors of musculoskeletal need.

Authors:  Michael J Dunbar; Andrew Howard; Earl R Bogoch; Javad Parvizi; Hans J Kreder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee; Hee-Tae Nam
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Daniel A Oakes; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency.

Authors:  D J Berry; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

9.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Surgical management of polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis with modular uncemented acetabular components.

Authors:  Douglas D R Naudie; Charles A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

2.  Biological fixation of total hip arthroplasty: Facts and factors.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-15

3.  Acetabular reconstruction with a reinforcement device and bone grafting in revision arthroplasty-a mean five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Ancuța Zazgyva; Sándor-György Zuh; Ciprian Oliviu Roman; István Gergely; Tudor Sorin Pop
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Hou-Tsung Chen; Cheng-Ta Wu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Hsin-Nung Shih; Jun-Wen Wang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.

Authors:  Pascal Mueller Greber; Isabella Manzoni; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION IN PAPROSKY TYPE III DEFECTS.

Authors:  Jaime J Morales De Cano; Llorenç Guillamet; Arturo Perez Pons
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Induced Membrane Bone Grafting Technique for Treatment of Large Postinfectious Acetabular Bone Defects.

Authors:  Gerald Joseph Zeng; Wei Sheng Foong; Sheng Xu; Hee Nee Pang
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.