Literature DB >> 26164715

The value of bulk femoral head allograft in acetabular reconstruction using Kerboull-type plate.

Daisuke Inoue1, Tamon Kabata, Toru Maeda, Yoshitomo Kajino, Takashi Yamamoto, Tomoharu Takagi, Takaaki Oomori, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the mid- and long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a KT plate with an allograft and showed the utility of filling the bony defect with bulk femoral head allograft rather than morselised allograft.
METHODS: We retrospectively investigated a consecutive series of 31 hips in 30 patients who underwent primary THA or revision THA between March 2002 and March 2012. Bulk grafts from femoral head allografts were used in 16 hips and morselised grafts were used in 15 hips. The mean follow-up period was 7.2 years (3-13 years). The acetabular bone defects were classified according to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons grading system. Type II defects were present in five hips; 26 hips were type III.
RESULTS: Radiological failure, defined as absolute error of the inclination of the KT plate >3°, breakage of the KT plate or screw, and/or absolute error of the vertical or horizontal migration of the femoral head >3 mm was found in 12 cases. All these complications appeared in the morselized group; there were no complications in the bulk group. The eight-year survival rate of morselised grafts was 52.5% and that of bulk grafts was 100%, using radiological loosening as an end point.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that using bulk graft from femoral head allografts is necessary to achieve mechanically stable reconstruction for large acetabular bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26164715     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2857-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device: 35 hips followed for 3-7 years.

Authors:  John V Lunn; Stephen S Kearns; William Quinlan; Paraic Murray; John O Byrne
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.

Authors:  B Willem Schreurs; Vincent J J F Busch; Marianne L Welten; Nico Verdonschot; Tom J J H Slooff; Jean W M Gardeniers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years.

Authors:  K Kawanabe; H Akiyama; E Onishi; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-01

4.  Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Kunihiko Okano; Noriaki Miyata; Hiroshi Enomoto; Makoto Osaki; Hiroyuki Shindo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.

Authors:  H Akiyama; K Yamamoto; M Tsukanaka; K Kawanabe; H Otsuka; K So; K Goto; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-09

7.  Porous-coated cementless acetabular components without bulk bone graft in revision surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito; Hiromasa Tanino; Yasuhiro Yamanaka; Tatsuya Sato; Akio Minami; Takeo Matsuno
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts.

Authors:  M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

10.  Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review.

Authors:  M Abolghasemian; S Tangsataporn; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  CORR Insights®: Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  James A Keeney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular reconstruction with a reinforcement device and bone grafting in revision arthroplasty-a mean five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Ancuța Zazgyva; Sándor-György Zuh; Ciprian Oliviu Roman; István Gergely; Tudor Sorin Pop
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Incorporation and Remodeling of Structural Allografts in Acetabular Reconstruction: Multiscale, Micro-Morphological Analysis of 13 Pelvic Explants.

Authors:  Sebastian Butscheidt; Menard Moritz; Thorsten Gehrke; Klaus Püschel; Michael Amling; Michael Hahn; Tim Rolvien
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.284

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.