Literature DB >> 26531197

Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial.

Daniel J Kiely1,2, Walter H Gotlieb3, Susie Lau3, Xing Zeng4, Vanessa Samouelian5, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar6, Helena Zakrzewski7, Sonya Brin3, Shannon A Fraser8, Pira Korsieporn9, Laura Drudi10, Joshua Z Press11.   

Abstract

The objective of this randomized, controlled trial was to assess whether voluntary participation in a proctored, proficiency-based, virtual reality robotic suturing curriculum using the da Vinci(®) Skills Simulator™ improves robotic suturing performance. Residents and attending surgeons were randomized to participation or non-participation during a 5 week training curriculum. Robotic suturing skills were evaluated before and after training using an inanimate vaginal cuff model, which participants sutured for 10 min using the da Vinci(®) Surgical System. Performances were videotaped, anonymized, and subsequently graded independently by three robotic surgeons. 27 participants were randomized. 23 of the 27 completed both the pre- and post-test, 13 in the training group and 10 in the control group. Mean training time in the intervention group was 238 ± 136 min (SD) over the 5 weeks. The primary outcome (improvement in GOALS+ score) and the secondary outcomes (improvement in GEARS, total knots, satisfactory knots, and the virtual reality suture sponge 1 task) were significantly greater in the training group than the control group in unadjusted analysis. After adjusting for lower baseline scores in the training group, improvement in the suture sponge 1 task remained significantly greater in the training group and a trend was demonstrated to greater improvement in the training group for the GOALS+ score, GEARS score, total knots, and satisfactory knots.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer simulation; Graduate medical education; Operative surgical procedures; Patient simulation; Randomized controlled trial; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26531197     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0513-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  24 in total

1.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; David W Goldfarb; James C Sander; Brian J Miles; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Phillip Mucksavage; David C Kerbl; Victor B Huynh; Mohamed Etafy; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Genevieve Dulan; Deborah C Hogg; Robert V Rege; Cathryn E Powers; Seifu T Tesfay; Linda S Hynan; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind.

Authors:  Richard K Reznick; Helen MacRae
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Robotic virtual reality simulation plus standard robotic orientation versus standard robotic orientation alone: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine M Vaccaro; Catrina C Crisp; Angela N Fellner; Christopher Jackson; Steven D Kleeman; James Pavelka
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 8.  Robotic surgical simulation.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  A lifelike patient simulator for teaching robotic colorectal surgery: how to acquire skills for robotic rectal dissection.

Authors:  S J Marecik; L M Prasad; J J Park; R K Pearl; R J Evenhouse; A Shah; K Khan; H Abcarian
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Validation of the da Vinci Surgical Skill Simulator across three surgical disciplines: A pilot study.

Authors:  Tarek Alzahrani; Richard Haddad; Abdullah Alkhayal; Josée Delisle; Laura Drudi; Walter Gotlieb; Shannon Fraser; Simon Bergman; Frank Bladou; Sero Andonian; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

View more
  10 in total

1.  Design methodology for a simulator of a robotic surgical system.

Authors:  Danielle L Julian; Roger D Smith; Alyssa D S Tanaka; Ariel Dubin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Evaluation of different time schedules in training with the Da Vinci simulator.

Authors:  C Güldner; A Orth; P Dworschak; I Diogo; M Mandapathil; A Teymoortash; U Walliczek-Dworschak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.

Authors:  Lisette Hvid Hovgaard; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen; Lars Konge; Torur Dalsgaard; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Development of a surgical training model for bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Hyeong Won Yu; Jin Wook Yi; Chan Yong Seong; Jong-Kyu Kim; In Eui Bae; Hyungju Kwon; Young Jun Chai; Su-Jin Kim; June Young Choi; Kyu Eun Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Daniel G Davila; Melissa C Helm; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould; Matthew I Goldblatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A model for predicting the GEARS score from virtual reality surgical simulator metrics.

Authors:  Ariel Kate Dubin; Danielle Julian; Alyssa Tanaka; Patricia Mattingly; Roger Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Development of an affordable, immersive model for robotic vaginal cuff closure: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Federico Gheza; Lauren Pinkard; Arielle Grand; Gabriela Aguiluz-Cornejo; Alberto Mangano; Andras Ladanyi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 8.  Robotic Surgery Techniques to Improve Traditional Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Tovah Williamson; Sang-Eun Song
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 9.  Role of Simulation-Based Training in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Sidney Klajner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

Review 10.  Vaginal Cuff Closure in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Review of Training, Techniques, and Materials.

Authors:  Katherine Smith; Aileen Caceres
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-10-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.