Hyeong Won Yu1, Jin Wook Yi2, Chan Yong Seong2, Jong-Kyu Kim2, In Eui Bae1, Hyungju Kwon3, Young Jun Chai4,5, Su-Jin Kim2,5, June Young Choi1,5, Kyu Eun Lee6,7. 1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 5. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kyueunlee@snu.ac.kr. 7. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kyueunlee@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA RT) is an excellent surgical method, being oncologically safe and with anatomic views similar to those of open surgery. BABA RT, however, requires training and a learning curve for proficiency. We evaluated the educational effectiveness of a surgical training model for BABA RT, comparing objective BABA scores with scores on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS). METHODS: Medical students, surgical residents, and surgical fellows performed structured tasks with the BABA training model and dVSS under the same conditions. All tasks were videotaped. BABA scores were compared with dVSS scores and with objective evaluation scores (GEARS and OSATS). RESULTS: Eight medical students, ten surgical residents, and eight surgical fellows participated in this study. The educational effect of BABA training improved from one to two (p < 0.001), two to three (p = 0.003), and one to three (p < 0.001) procedures. Statistically significant differences were found when students were compared with residents (p = 0.025) and fellows (p < 0.001) in the BABA training model, and between students and fellows (p = 0.004) in dVSS. BABA scores showed similar distribution patterns in the three groups to GEARS and OSATS scores (p < 0.001 each). CONCLUSIONS: The BABA training model is an excellent educational tool for surgical residents and surgical fellows to learn and practice BABA RT. Assessment by BABA score yielded objective results comparable to those of traditional scoring methodologies.
BACKGROUND: Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA RT) is an excellent surgical method, being oncologically safe and with anatomic views similar to those of open surgery. BABA RT, however, requires training and a learning curve for proficiency. We evaluated the educational effectiveness of a surgical training model for BABA RT, comparing objective BABA scores with scores on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS). METHODS: Medical students, surgical residents, and surgical fellows performed structured tasks with the BABA training model and dVSS under the same conditions. All tasks were videotaped. BABA scores were compared with dVSS scores and with objective evaluation scores (GEARS and OSATS). RESULTS: Eight medical students, ten surgical residents, and eight surgical fellows participated in this study. The educational effect of BABA training improved from one to two (p < 0.001), two to three (p = 0.003), and one to three (p < 0.001) procedures. Statistically significant differences were found when students were compared with residents (p = 0.025) and fellows (p < 0.001) in the BABA training model, and between students and fellows (p = 0.004) in dVSS. BABA scores showed similar distribution patterns in the three groups to GEARS and OSATS scores (p < 0.001 each). CONCLUSIONS: The BABA training model is an excellent educational tool for surgical residents and surgical fellows to learn and practice BABA RT. Assessment by BABA score yielded objective results comparable to those of traditional scoring methodologies.
Keywords:
Bilateral axillo-breast approach; Education; Simulation; Simulator; Training model
Authors: Kyu Eun Lee; Do Hoon Koo; Hyung Jun Im; Sue K Park; June Young Choi; Jin Chul Paeng; June-Key Chung; Seung Keun Oh; Yeo-Kyu Youn Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Daniel J Kiely; Walter H Gotlieb; Susie Lau; Xing Zeng; Vanessa Samouelian; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Helena Zakrzewski; Sonya Brin; Shannon A Fraser; Pira Korsieporn; Laura Drudi; Joshua Z Press Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2015-05-16
Authors: Michael A Liss; Corollos Abdelshehid; Stephen Quach; Achim Lusch; Joseph Graversen; Jaime Landman; Elspeth M McDougall Journal: J Endourol Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Gunter De Win; Siska Van Bruwaene; Jyotsna Kulkarni; Ben Van Calster; Rajesh Aggarwal; Christopher Allen; Ann Lissens; Dirk De Ridder; Marc Miserez Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2016-06-30
Authors: Kuo Chen; Jin Zhang; Narasimha M Beeraka; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov; Xinliang Zhang; Yu Cao; Pengwei Lu Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 4.241