Literature DB >> 29214515

Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training.

Daniel G Davila1, Melissa C Helm1, Matthew J Frelich1, Jon C Gould1, Matthew I Goldblatt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General Surgery is currently the fastest growing specialty with regards to robotic surgical system utilization. Contrary to the experience in laparoscopy, simulator training for robotic surgery is not widely employed partly because robotic surgical simulators are expensive. We sought to determine the effect of a robotic simulation curriculum and whether robotic surgical skills could be derived from those psychomotor skills attained in laparoscopic training.
METHODS: Twenty-seven trainees with no prior robotic experience and limited laparoscopy exposure were randomly assigned to one of three training groups: no simulator training, training on a fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS™) standard box trainer, and training on a robotic computer based simulator (da Vinci Skills Simulator™). Baseline robotic surgical skills were assessed on the clinical robot docked to a standard FLS trainer box on two tasks-intracorporeal knot tying and peg transfer. Subjects subsequently underwent four 1-h long training sessions in their assigned training environment over a course of several weeks. Robotic surgical skills were reassessed on the robot on the same two tasks used to assess skills prior to training.
RESULTS: FLS training resulted in a greater score improvement than no training for both knot and peg scores. FLS training was also determined to result in greater score improvement than robotic simulator training for knot tying. There was no significant difference in peg transfer or knot tying scores when comparing robotic simulator training and no training.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgical skills can be in part derived from psychomotor skills developed in a laparoscopic trainer, especially for complex skills such as intracorporeal knot tying. Acquisition of robotic surgical skills may be enhanced by practice on a laparoscopic simulator using the FLS curriculum. This may be especially helpful when a robotic simulator is not available or is poorly accessible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Randomized controlled trial; Robotic surgical procedures; Robotics; Simulation training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214515     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5963-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents.

Authors:  Ruslan Korets; Adam C Mues; Joseph A Graversen; Mantu Gupta; Mitchell C Benson; Kimberly L Cooper; Jaime Landman; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Vasileios Theocharidis; Travis J McKenzie; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Theodora Psaltopoulou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel J Kiely; Walter H Gotlieb; Susie Lau; Xing Zeng; Vanessa Samouelian; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Helena Zakrzewski; Sonya Brin; Shannon A Fraser; Pira Korsieporn; Laura Drudi; Joshua Z Press
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-05-16

4.  Do laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic surgery?

Authors:  Lucian Panait; Shohan Shetty; Patricia A Shewokis; Juan A Sanchez
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Byung-Eun Yoo; Jae-Sung Cho; Jae-Won Shin; Dong-Won Lee; Jung-Myun Kwak; Jin Kim; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum.

Authors:  Andrew P Stegemann; Kamran Ahmed; Johar R Syed; Shabnam Rehman; Khurshid Ghani; Ricardo Autorino; Mohamed Sharif; Amrith Rao; Yi Shi; Gregory E Wilding; James M Hassett; Ashirwad Chowriappa; Thenkurussi Kesavadas; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Jihad Kaouk; Khurshid Ahad Guru
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lauren Thomaier; Megan Orlando; Melinda Abernethy; Chandhana Paka; Chi Chiung Grace Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum.

Authors:  Justin Bric; Michael Connolly; Andrew Kastenmeier; Matthew Goldblatt; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The effects of video games on laparoscopic simulator skills.

Authors:  Maarten B Jalink; Jetse Goris; Erik Heineman; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie; Henk O ten Cate Hoedemaker
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acquisition of robotic surgical skills does not require laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roberto Vanin Pinto Ribeiro; João Maximiliano; Guilherme Barreiro; Olavo Haas de Souza Gastal; Pauline Simas Machado; Luciano Paludo Marcelino; Henrique Rasia Bosi; Eduardo Madalosso Zanin; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  E Willuth; S F Hardon; F Lang; C M Haney; E A Felinska; K F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich; T Horeman; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.