Literature DB >> 35353300

Development of an affordable, immersive model for robotic vaginal cuff closure: a randomized trial.

Federico Gheza1, Lauren Pinkard2, Arielle Grand2, Gabriela Aguiluz-Cornejo3, Alberto Mangano3, Andras Ladanyi2.   

Abstract

Safe and secure closure of the vaginal cuff is a critical component of a robotic assisted hysterectomy procedure. Our aim in this study is to develop and validate a novel vaginal cuff closure model (VC) created from porcine heart that allows trainees to obtain competency in a low-risk environment. Ten expert and 20 novice robotic surgeons performed a cuff closure exercise on the VC model and on the dV-Trainer®, a virtual reality simulator (VR). Performances were timed, videotaped, and scored using the modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (mGEARS) score. Expert robotic surgeons completed the task faster on both the VR (531 vs. 814 s, p = 0.03) and the VC platforms (311 vs. 631 s, p < 0.001) and achieved higher mGEAR scores (32.25 vs. 22.07, p < 0.0001). Knot quality and suturing accuracy were better in the VC than in the VR environment in both groups. In a post-completion survey, both expert and novice surgeons expressed strong preference towards the VC model. In this study, the novel VC model proved to be a reliable simulation tool with high face, content, and construct validity. Due to its simplicity and low cost, this high-yield simulation exercise can easily be incorporated into robotic training curricula of obstetrics and gynecology residents.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Model; Robotic surgery; Training; Vaginal cuff closure

Year:  2022        PMID: 35353300     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01404-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  28 in total

1.  Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency.

Authors:  Joseph M Gobern; Christopher M Novak; Ernest G Lockrow
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 2.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.

Authors:  Jeroen Heemskerk; Wim G van Gemert; Jolanda de Vries; Janwillem Greve; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Robotic surgical training program in gynecology: how to train residents and fellows.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Geller; Kevin M Schuler; John F Boggess
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 6.  The role of simulation and warm-up in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Janelle K Moulder; Michelle Louie; Tarek Toubia; Lauren D Schiff; Matthew T Siedhoff
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 7.  Role of virtual simulation in surgical training.

Authors:  Davide Zerbato; Diego Dall'Alba
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-08

8.  Development of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial Protocol: A National Cluster-Randomized Trial of Resident Duty Hour Policies.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Jeanette W Chung; Larry V Hedges; Allison R Dahlke; Remi Love; Mark E Cohen; John Tarpley; John Mellinger; David M Mahvi; Rachel R Kelz; Clifford Y Ko; David B Hoyt; Frank H Lewis
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynecologists.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Hye-Chun Hur; Susan Johnson; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic hysterectomy strategies in the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Oscar D Almeida
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.