Literature DB >> 22037477

Effects of middle-ear disorders on power reflectance measured in cadaveric ear canals.

Susan E Voss1, Gabrielle R Merchant, Nicholas J Horton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reflectance measured in the ear canal offers a noninvasive method to monitor the acoustic properties of the middle ear, and few systematic measurements exist on the effects of various middle-ear disorders on the reflectance. This work uses a human cadaver-ear preparation and a mathematical middle-ear model to both measure and predict how power reflectance R is affected by the middle-ear disorders of static middle-ear pressures, middle-ear fluid, fixed stapes, disarticulated incudostapedial joint, and tympanic-membrane perforations.
DESIGN: R was calculated from ear-canal pressure measurements made on human-cadaver ears in the normal condition and five states: (1) positive and negative pressure in the middle-ear cavity, (2) fluid-filled middle ear, (3) stapes fixed with dental cement, (4) incudostapedial joint disarticulated, and (5) tympanic-membrane perforations. The middle-ear model of Kringlebotn (1988) was modified to represent the middle-ear disorders. Model predictions are compared with measurements.
RESULTS: For a given disorder, the general trends of the measurements and model were similar. The changes from normal in R, induced by the simulated disorder, generally depend on frequency and the extent of the disorder (except for the disarticulation). Systematic changes in middle-ear static pressure (up to 6300 daPa) resulted in systematic increases in R. These affects were most pronounced for frequencies up to 1000 to 2000 Hz. Above about 2000 Hz there were some asymmetries in behavior between negative and positive pressures. Results with fluid in the middle-ear air space were highly dependent on the percentage of the air space that was filled. Changes in R were minimal when a smaller fraction of the air space was filled with fluid, and as the air space was filled with more saline, R increased at most frequencies. Fixation of the stapes generally resulted in a relatively small low-frequency increase in R. Disarticulation of the incus with the stapes led to a consistent low-frequency decrease in R with a distinctive minimum below 1000 Hz. Perforations of the tympanic membrane resulted in a decrease in R for frequencies up to about 2000 Hz; at these lower frequencies, smaller perforations led to larger changes from normal when compared with larger perforations.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary measurements help assess the utility of power reflectance as a diagnostic tool for middle-ear disorders. In particular, the measurements document (1) the frequency ranges for which the changes are largest and (2) the extent of the changes from normal for a spectrum of middle-ear disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22037477      PMCID: PMC3718455          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823235b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  47 in total

1.  Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. II. A simple model.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal.

Authors:  B L Farmer-Fedor; R D Rabbitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Energy transmittance predicts conductive hearing loss in older children and adults.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Jeffrey L Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tympanometric asymmetry.

Authors:  R H Margolis; P Smith
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-09

5.  Network model for the human middle ear.

Authors:  M Kringlebotn
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1988

6.  Input impedance of the cochlea in cat.

Authors:  T J Lynch; V Nedzelnitsky; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The size of the middle ear and the mastoid air cell.

Authors:  O I Molvaer; F M Vallersnes; M Kringlebotn
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Mechanisms of hearing loss resulting from middle-ear fluid.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance measurements in human neonates. II. Predictions of middle-ear in dysfunction and sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Fei Zhao; Betty R Vohr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Wideband energy reflectance measurements in adults with middle-ear disorders.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Iain L Grant; Lindsay P Marryott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  25 in total

1.  Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry: a novel method in identifying otosclerosis.

Authors:  Arunraj Karuppannan; Animesh Barman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Factors affecting sound energy absorbance in acute otitis media model of chinchilla.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Thomas W Seale; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Motion of tympanic membrane in guinea pig otitis media model measured by scanning laser Doppler vibrometry.

Authors:  Xuelin Wang; Xiying Guan; Mario Pineda; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.

Authors:  Sarah R Robinson; Cac T Nguyen; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.