Literature DB >> 23900187

An overview of wideband immittance measurements techniques and terminology: you say absorbance, I say reflectance.

John J Rosowski1, Stefan Stenfelt, David Lilly.   

Abstract

This article reviews the relationships among different acoustic measurements of the mobility of the tympanic membrane, including impedance, admittance, reflectance, and absorbance, which the authors group under the rubric of immittance measures. Each of these quantities is defined and related to the others. The relationship is most easily grasped in terms of a straight rigid ear canal of uniform area terminated by a uniform middle ear immittance placed perpendicular to the long axis of the ear canal. Complications due to variations from this geometry are discussed. Different methods for measuring these quantities are described, and the assumptions inherent within each method are made explicit. The benefits of wideband measurements of these quantities are described, as are the benefits and limitations of different components of immittance and reflectance/absorbance. While power reflectance (the square of the magnitude of pressure reflectance) is relatively invariant along the length of the ear canal, it has the disadvantage that it ignores phase information that may be useful in assessing the presence of acoustic leaks in ear-canal measurements and identifying other potential error sources. A combination of reflectance and impedance magnitude and angle give a more complete description of the middle ear from measurements in the ear canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23900187      PMCID: PMC3800001          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d5a14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  23 in total

1.  The terminal zone of the external auditory meatus in a variety of mammals.

Authors:  F H Di Maio; J Tonndorf
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-10

2.  Transformation characteristics of the external human ear.

Authors:  S Mehrgardt; V Mellert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution.

Authors:  M R Stinson; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Acoustic impedance of pathological ears.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; A S Feldman
Journal:  ASHA Monogr       Date:  1970-01

5.  Measurement of the eardrum impedance of human ears.

Authors:  H Hudde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Estimation of acoustical energy reflectance at the eardrum from measurements of pressure distribution in the human ear canal.

Authors:  M R Stinson; E A Shaw; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Middle-ear characteristics of anesthetized cats.

Authors:  J J Guinan; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Prediction of conductive hearing loss using wideband acoustic immittance.

Authors:  Beth A Prieve; M Patrick Feeney; Stefan Stenfelt; Navid Shahnaz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Tests of some common assumptions of ear-canal acoustics in cats.

Authors:  G T Huang; J J Rosowski; S Puria; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Full-field transient vibrometry of the human tympanic membrane by local phase correlation and high-speed holography.

Authors:  Ivo Dobrev; Cosme Furlong; Jeffrey T Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Acoustic Immittance, Absorbance, and Reflectance in the Human Ear Canal.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Laura Ann Wilber
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-02

8.  Optimization of a lensless digital holographic otoscope system for transient measurements of the human tympanic membrane.

Authors:  I Dobrev; C Furlong; J T Cheng; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Exp Mech       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.808

9.  Longitudinal development of wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal and at-risk infants.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Maturation of middle ear transmission in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Zoë Dinger; Lauren Renken
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.