Literature DB >> 19706586

Decision-making by adolescents and parents of children with cancer regarding health research participation.

Kate Read1, Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Jun Gao, Caron Strahlendorf, Albert Moghrabi, Rebecca Davis Pentz, Raymond Carlton Barfield, Justin Nathaniel Baker, Darcy Santor, Charles Weijer, Eric Kodish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low rates of participation of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in clinical oncology trials may contribute to poorer outcomes. Factors that influence the decision of AYAs to participate in health research and whether these factors are different from those that affect the participation of parents of children with cancer.
METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from validated questionnaires provided to adolescents (>12 years old) diagnosed with cancer and parents of children with cancer at 3 sites in Canada (Halifax, Vancouver, and Montreal) and 2 in the United States (Atlanta, GA, and Memphis, TN). Respondents reported their own research participation and cited factors that would influence their own decision to participate in, or to provide parental authorization for their child to participate in health research.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaire rates for AYAs and parents were 86 (46.5%) of 185 and 409 (65.2%) of 627, respectively. AYAs (n = 86 [67%]) and parents (n = 409 [85%]) cited that they would participate in research because it would help others. AYAs perceived pressure by their family and friends (16%) and their physician (19%). Having too much to think about at the time of accrual was an impediment to both groups (36% AYAs and 47% parents). The main deterrent for AYAs was that research would take up too much time (45%). Nonwhite parents (7 of 56 [12.5%]) were more apt to decline than white parents (12 of 32 [3.7%]; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: AYAs identified time commitment and having too much to think about as significant impediments to research participation. Addressing these barriers by minimizing time requirements and further supporting decision-making may improve informed consent and impact on enrollment in trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706586     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-2878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  22 in total

1.  Randomization is not associated with socio-economic and demographic factors in a multi-center clinical trial of children with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Dionna O Roberts; Brittany Covert; Mark J Rodeghier; Nagina Parmar; Michael R DeBaun; Alexis A Thompson; Robert I Liem
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Improving recruitment and retention of adolescents and young adults with cancer in randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Sharron L Docherty; Stacey Crane; Joan E Haase; Sheri L Robb
Journal:  Int J Adolesc Med Health       Date:  2019-04-11

3.  The Benefits and Burdens of Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meaghann S Weaver; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Katherine Patterson Kelly; Kathleen Montgomery; Amy R Newman; Christine A Fortney; Cynthia J Bell; Jessica L Spruit; Melissa Kurtz Uveges; Lori Wiener; Cynthia M Schmidt; Vanessa N Madrigal; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  A prospective, observational cohort study comparing cancer clinical trial availability and enrollment between early adolescents/young adults and children.

Authors:  Stefanie M Thomas; Jemily Malvar; Henry Tran; Jared Shows; David R Freyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

7.  Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

8.  Patient involvement in informed consent for pediatric phase I cancer research.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Justin N Baker; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Eric Kodish
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.289

9.  Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Joshua G Rosenberger; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Allowing adolescents and young adults to plan their end-of-life care.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Sima Zadeh; Haven Battles; Kristin Baird; Elizabeth Ballard; Janet Osherow; Maryland Pao
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.