Literature DB >> 23828017

Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23828017     DOI： 10.1038/gim.2013.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN： 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


× No keyword cloud information.
  63 in total

Review 1.  Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Ma'n H Zawati; Karine Sénécal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.

Authors:  K A Kaphingst; J Ivanovich; B B Biesecker; R Dresser; J Seo; L G Dressler; P J Goodfellow; M S Goodman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Whole Genome Sequencing as a Genetic Test for Autism Spectrum Disorder: From Bench to Bedside and then Back Again.

Authors:  Michael J Szego; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-01

4.  Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.

Authors:  Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa; Mireille Claustres; Ros J Hastings; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Gabrielle Christenhusz; Maurizio Genuardi; Béla Melegh; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Philippos Patsalis; Joris Vermeesch; Martina C Cornel; Beverly Searle; Aarno Palotie; Ettore Capoluongo; Borut Peterlin; Xavier Estivill; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Management of Secondary Genomic Findings.

Authors:  Alexander E Katz; Robert L Nussbaum; Benjamin D Solomon; Heidi L Rehm; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.

Authors:  Marlies Saelaert; Heidi Mertes; Elfride De Baere; Ignaas Devisch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  The fiduciary relationship model for managing clinical genomic "incidental" findings.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Mapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Wylie Burke; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.