Literature DB >> 11070647

Mothers and daughters from breast cancer families: a qualitative study of their perceptions of risks and benefits associated with minor's participation in genetic susceptibility research.

G Geller1, E S Tambor, B A Bernhardt, L S Wissow, G Fraser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine: 1) the views of daughters at increased risk of developing breast cancer regarding the benefits and risks of participating in genetic susceptibility research; 2) mothers' views about enrolling their daughters in genetic susceptibility research; and 3) any important areas of agreement and disagreement between mothers and daughters in their assessment of risks and benefits.
METHODS: We conducted separate interviews of mothers and daughters from 12 breast cancer families recruited primarily through the Breast Center at Johns Hopkins University. Daughters were between the ages of 10 and 17. Interviews were transcribed and coded and analyzed qualitatively.
RESULTS: We observed that mothers and daughters had a range of reactions to the prospect of enrolling children and adolescents in genetic susceptibility research, that perceptions of benefits and risks were fairly concordant between mothers and daughters, and that daughters initially identified no risks of participating, but their perceptions of the risks and benefits of genetic susceptibility research evolved over the course of conversation.
CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the view that informed consent ought to be a "process" rather than a single event, and that children's first reactions to the prospect of participating in genetic testing research should not be taken as evidence that they have adequately considered the risks and benefits of participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11070647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)        ISSN: 0098-8421


  7 in total

1.  The Colored, Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM): A Conceptual Approach and Tool for Genetic Counseling Research.

Authors:  R Kenen; J Peters
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  Controversies in communication of genetic screening results for cancer: a report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Screening Special Interest Group (ASPO's 33rd Annual Meeting, March 8 to 10, 2009, Tampa, Florida).

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Angela R Bradbury; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  When parents disclose BRCA1/2 test results: their communication and perceptions of offspring response.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Mary B Daly; Cynthia W Moore; Colleen B Sands; Helen Schmidheiser; Preethi K Kondamudi; Maia Feigon; Comfort N Ibe; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Knowledge and perceptions of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer risk in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Lisa A Schwartz; Colleen B Sands; Rebecca Shorter; Cynthia W Moore; Lisa Tuchman; Paula Rauch; Shreya Malhotra; Brianne Rowan; Stephanie Van Decker; Helen Schmidheiser; Lisa Bealin; Patrick Sicilia; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Experience, knowledge, and opinions about childhood genetic testing in Batten disease.

Authors:  Heather R Adams; Katherine Rose; Erika F Augustine; Jennifer M Kwon; Elisabeth A deBlieck; Frederick J Marshall; Amy Vierhile; Jonathan W Mink; Martha A Nance
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.797

7.  Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent.

Authors:  Jana Strohmaier; Stephanie H Witt; Josef Frank; Noemi Lemme; Laura Flatau; Fabian Streit; Jerome C Foo; Markus Reitt; Dan Rujescu; Thomas G Schulze; Dirk Lanzerath; Franciska Illes; Franziska Degenhardt; Marcella Rietschel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.568

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.