| Literature DB >> 26460691 |
Wataru Fujii1, Asuka Onuma, Shin Yoshioka, Keisuke Nagashima, Koji Sugiura, Kunihiko Naito.
Abstract
The generation efficiencies of mutation-induced mice when using engineered zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) have been generally 10 to 20% of obtained pups in previous studies. The discovery of high-affinity DNA-binding modules can contribute to the generation of various kinds of novel artificial chromatin-targeting tools, such as zinc-finger acetyltransferases, zinc-finger histone kinases and so on, as well as improvement of reported zinc-finger recombinases and zinc-finger methyltransferases. Here, we report a novel ZFN pair that has a highly efficient mutation-induction ability in murine zygotes. The ZFN pair induced mutations in all obtained mice in the target locus, exon 17 of aminopeptidase Q gene, and almost all of the pups had biallelic mutations. This high efficiency was also shown in the plasmid DNA transfected in a cultured human cell line. The induced mutations were inherited normally in the next generation. The zinc-finger modules of this ZFN pair are expected to contribute to the development of novel ZF-attached chromatin-targeting tools.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26460691 PMCID: PMC4685226 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2015-087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.Schematics of constructed ZFNs and the target DNA sequence. L1–4 and R1–4 indicate each zinc-finger motif.
Amino acid sequences of DNA recognition sites in each zinc-finger motif used in the ZFNs
| DNA recognition sequence | Target triplet DNA | |
| L1 | DRSHLTR | GGC |
| L2 | DRSNLTR | GAC |
| L3 | QSGNLTE | CAA |
| L4 | QSGNLAR | GAA |
| R1 | QSSSLVR | GTA |
| R2 | QSGDLTR | GCA |
| R3 | QSSDLTR | GCT |
| R4 | QAGHLAS | TGA |
Fig. 2.Generation of mutant mice and their inheritance. (A) Mutation patterns of mutated alleles from 16 obtained pups. The target loci of the pups were amplified by genomic PCR, and the PCR products were sequenced directly. Three pups were monoallelic mutants, and the other 13 were biallelic mutants. Four mutated alleles were not defined by the present PCR analysis. The vertical row indicates the number of inserted (+) or deleted (–) bases in each allele, and the horizontal row indicates the number of alleles having the indicated mutations. (B) Inheritance analysis of the mutations. A female having 2 base deletions in both alleles and a male having 5 base deletions and 16 base deletions in each allele were used as F0 mice. F0 mutations were naturally inherited in all F1 pups, but one unexpected mutation was observed in one pup.
Fig. 3.SSA assay of the Aqpep-ZFN and Rosa 26-ZFN pairs. (A) One of the eGFP reporter plasmids was transfected with or without the corresponding ZFN plasmid into HEK293 cells, and then the fluorescent signals were observed after 48 h. (B) Three rounds of experiments were performed, and the fluorescent signals were analyzed by ImageJ. The results are shown as the mean + SD. * Significant difference (P < 0.05). N.S., no significant difference.