Literature DB >> 15000198

Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children.

Richard S McGowan1, Susan Nittrouer, Carol J Manning.   

Abstract

Beginning at the age of about 14 months, eight children who lived in a rhotic dialect region of the United States were recorded approximately every 2 months interacting with their parents. All were recorded until at least the age of 26 months, and some until the age of 31 months. Acoustic analyses of speech samples indicated that these young children acquired [inverted r] production ability at different ages for [inverted r]'s in different syllable positions. The children, as a group, had started to produce postvocalic and syllabic [inverted r] in an adult-like manner by the end of the recording sessions, but were not yet showing evidence of having acquired prevocalic [inverted r]. Articulatory limitations of young children are posited as a cause for the difference in development of [inverted r] according to syllable position. Specifically, it is speculated that adult-like prevocalic [inverted r] production requires two lingual constrictions: one in the mouth, and the other in the pharynx, while postvocalic and syllabic [inverted r] requires only one oral constriction. Two lingual constrictions could be difficult for young children to produce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15000198      PMCID: PMC3987658          DOI: 10.1121/1.1642624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Acoustic modeling of American English /r/.

Authors:  C Y Espy-Wilson; S E Boyce; M Jackson; S Narayanan; A Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

Authors:  A B Smit; L Hand; J J Freilinger; J E Bernthal; A Bird
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-11

3.  Acoustic characteristics of English /w,r,l/ spoken correctly by young children and adults.

Authors:  R M Dalston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Differences in fricative production between children and adults: evidence from an acoustic analysis of /sh/ and /s/.

Authors:  R S McGowan; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  When are speech sounds learned?

Authors:  E K Sander
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1972-02

6.  Children's identification and reproduction of (w), (r), and (l).

Authors:  P Menyuk; S Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1969-03

7.  Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Articulation Norms Project: consonant singletons.

Authors:  A B Smit
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-06

8.  Phonetic inventories, 15-24 months: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  C Stoel-Gammon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-12

9.  Developmental study of vowel formant frequencies in an imitation task.

Authors:  R D Kent; L L Forner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contextual-coarticulatory inconsistency of /r/ misarticulation.

Authors:  P R Hoffman; G H Schuckers; D L Ratusnik
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-12
View more
  27 in total

1.  Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Edwin Maas; Jessica Whittle; Megan C Leece; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Predicting midsagittal pharyngeal dimensions from measures of anterior tongue position in Swedish vowels: statistical considerations.

Authors:  Michel T-T Jackson; Richard S McGowan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Burton; Jennell Vick; Harlan Lane; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Dugan; Noah Silbert; Tara McAllister; Jonathan L Preston; Carolyn Sotto; Suzanne E Boyce
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children's non-rhotic vowels.

Authors:  Heather Campbell; Tara McAllister Byun
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Daphna Harel; Peter F Halpin; Daniel Szeredi
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Methods for eliciting, annotating, and analyzing databases for child speech development.

Authors:  Mary E Beckman; Andrew R Plummer; Benjamin Munson; Patrick F Reidy
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.899

10.  Is statistical learning constrained by lower level perceptual organization?

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson; Ran Liu; Jason D Zevin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.