S J Lee1, N Binkley2, M G Lubner1, R J Bruce1, T J Ziemlewicz1, P J Pickhardt3. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Divisions of Endocrinology and Geriatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA. ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org.
Abstract
SUMMARY: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using abdominal CT scans obtained for other purposes has the potential to increase detection of those at increased risk for fragility fractures. We sought to combine the tasks of density measurement and vertebral fracture assessment on the sagittal view. We confirm that this represents a robust approach and recommend its implementation in clinical practice. INTRODUCTION: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal CT has been proposed by measuring axial (transverse) L1 trabecular attenuation and by sagittal reconstruction for vertebral fracture assessment. We sought to combine this dual evaluation on the sagittal reconstruction alone to improve efficiency. METHODS: Routine contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans performed for any indication on 571 consecutive adults age 60 years or older (mean age 70.7 years) were retrospectively analyzed. These were performed at a single center over a 3-month period. L1 trabecular attenuation was measured using an ovoid region-of-interest on both the transverse and sagittal series. The sagittal reconstruction was also analyzed for moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures using the Genant visual semi-quantitative method. Likely osteoporosis was defined by a moderate-to-severe fracture and/or sagittal L1 trabecular attenuation of ≤110 Hounsfield units (HU) (previously found to be >90% specific for osteoporosis on our calibrated GE CT scanners at 120 kV(p)). Correlation was made with hip and spine dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: Mean absolute difference in L1 trabecular attenuation between transverse and sagittal reconstructions was 6.7 HU (±5.7) or 6.2%. The transverse and sagittal HU measurements were in agreement (i.e., both measurements above or below this threshold) in 94.5% of cases at the 110-HU cutoff. A total of 243 (42.3%) patients had likely osteoporosis by CT criteria, of which only 48 (19.8%) had previous DXA screening. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the sagittal view alone at routine abdominal CT for both vertebral fractures and trabecular bone mineral density provides a rapid and effective opportunistic screen for detecting individuals at increased risk for fragility fractures.
SUMMARY: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using abdominal CT scans obtained for other purposes has the potential to increase detection of those at increased risk for fragility fractures. We sought to combine the tasks of density measurement and vertebral fracture assessment on the sagittal view. We confirm that this represents a robust approach and recommend its implementation in clinical practice. INTRODUCTION: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal CT has been proposed by measuring axial (transverse) L1 trabecular attenuation and by sagittal reconstruction for vertebral fracture assessment. We sought to combine this dual evaluation on the sagittal reconstruction alone to improve efficiency. METHODS: Routine contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans performed for any indication on 571 consecutive adults age 60 years or older (mean age 70.7 years) were retrospectively analyzed. These were performed at a single center over a 3-month period. L1 trabecular attenuation was measured using an ovoid region-of-interest on both the transverse and sagittal series. The sagittal reconstruction was also analyzed for moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures using the Genant visual semi-quantitative method. Likely osteoporosis was defined by a moderate-to-severe fracture and/or sagittal L1 trabecular attenuation of ≤110 Hounsfield units (HU) (previously found to be >90% specific for osteoporosis on our calibrated GE CT scanners at 120 kV(p)). Correlation was made with hip and spine dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: Mean absolute difference in L1 trabecular attenuation between transverse and sagittal reconstructions was 6.7 HU (±5.7) or 6.2%. The transverse and sagittal HU measurements were in agreement (i.e., both measurements above or below this threshold) in 94.5% of cases at the 110-HU cutoff. A total of 243 (42.3%) patients had likely osteoporosis by CT criteria, of which only 48 (19.8%) had previous DXA screening. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the sagittal view alone at routine abdominal CT for both vertebral fractures and trabecular bone mineral density provides a rapid and effective opportunistic screen for detecting individuals at increased risk for fragility fractures.
Authors: Oran D Kennedy; Orlaith Brennan; Susan M Rackard; Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee Journal: J Anat Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Lawrence J Lee; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Travis Lauder; Richard J Bruce; Ron M Summers; B Dustin Pooler; Neil Binkley Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Travis Lauder; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Richard J Bruce; Neil Binkley Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Elliot Varney; Asser Abou Elkassem; Majid Khan; Ellen Parker; Todd Nichols; David Joyner; Seth T Lirette; Candace Howard-Claudio; Andrew D Smith Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-10-12
Authors: Y Liu; A Dash; A Krez; H J Kim; M Cunningham; F Schwab; A Hughes; B Carlson; A Samuel; E Marty; H Moore; D J McMahon; J A Carrino; R S Bockman; E M Stein Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Samuel Jang; Peter M Graffy; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Scott J Lee; Ronald M Summers; Perry J Pickhardt Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 11.105