Literature DB >> 10457272

Age- and gender-related differences in vertebral bone mass, density, and strength.

E N Ebbesen1, J S Thomsen, H Beck-Nielsen, H J Nepper-Rasmussen, L Mosekilde.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate age- and gender-related differences in vertebral bone mass, density, and strength by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), peripheral QCT (pQCT), ash measurements, and biomechanical testing. The material comprised human lumbar vertebral bodies (L3) from 51 females and 50 males (age-range: 18-96 years). The results showed that females had significantly lower vertebral body bone mass (ash weight) than males at any given age. The decline in bone mass with age was parallel for females and males. The different bone density measurements-cancellous ash density, total vertebral body ash density, DXA bone mineral density, QCT, and pQCT-showed no gender-related difference concerning numeric value or changes with age. Morphometrical measurements showed that females had smaller vertebral bodies (volumes) than males. Hence the females had significantly smaller cross-sectional area (CSA) of L3 than males (11.6 cm2 and 14.4 cm2, respectively). This led to females having lower maximum compressive load (N) than males at all ages, whereas maximum compressive stress (load/CSA) showed no gender-related difference. In conclusion, females have lower vertebral body bone mass than males at any given age, due to smaller vertebral bodies. Hence, maximum compressive load (strength not corrected for size) was lower in females. Vertebral body cancellous bone density and total-vertebral body density were equal when comparing genders, and no gender differences were found in the size-corrected strength: maximum compressive stress. The decrease with age in vertebral body compressive strength decrease was twice as large as the age decrease in density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10457272     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.8.1394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  23 in total

1.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

Authors:  E-M Lochmüller; K Pöschl; L Würstlin; M Matsuura; R Müller; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Brazilian normal static bone histomorphometry: effects of age, sex, and race.

Authors:  Luciene M Dos Reis; João R Batalha; Daniel R Muñoz; Aurélio Borelli; Pedro H S Correa; Aluizio B Carvalho; Vanda Jorgetti
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Effects of hip abductor muscle forces and knee boundary conditions on femoral neck stresses during simulated falls.

Authors:  W J Choi; P A Cripton; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  How to select the elastic modulus for cancellous bone in patient-specific continuum models of the spine.

Authors:  I Diamant; R Shahar; A Gefen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Correspondence between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration across age and sex.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Brett Allaire; Paul M Fein; Darlene Lu; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Serkalem Demissie; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  [Biomechanical aspects of vertebral augmentation].

Authors:  H-J Wilke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load.

Authors:  Hagen Hartmann; Klaus Wirth; Markus Klusemann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins.

Authors:  Vasi Naganathan; Philip Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density.

Authors:  S J Lee; N Binkley; M G Lubner; R J Bruce; T J Ziemlewicz; P J Pickhardt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Age-related changes in vertebral and iliac crest 3D bone microstructure--differences and similarities.

Authors:  J S Thomsen; M V Jensen; A S Niklassen; E N Ebbesen; A Brüel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.