Literature DB >> 21590738

Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.

Perry J Pickhardt1, Lawrence J Lee, Alejandro Muñoz del Rio, Travis Lauder, Richard J Bruce, Ron M Summers, B Dustin Pooler, Neil Binkley.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of lumbar spine attenuation measurement for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment at screening computed tomographic colonography (CTC) using central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference standard. Two-hundred and fifty-two adults (240 women and 12 men; mean age 58.9 years) underwent CTC screening and central DXA BMD measurement within 2 months (mean interval 25.0 days). The lowest DXA T-score between the spine and hip served as the reference standard, with low BMD defined per World Health Organization as osteoporosis (DXA T-score ≤ -2.5) or osteopenia (DXA T-score between -1.0 and -2.4). Both phantomless quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and simple nonangled region-of-interest (ROI) multi-detector CT (MDCT) attenuation measurements were applied to the T(12) -L(5) levels. The ability to predict osteoporosis and low BMD (osteoporosis or osteopenia) by DXA was assessed. A BMD cut-off of 90 mg/mL at phantomless QCT yielded 100% sensitivity for osteoporosis (29 of 29) and a specificity of 63.8% (143 of 224); 87.2% (96 of 110) below this threshold had low BMD and 49.6% (69 of 139) above this threshold had normal BMD at DXA. At L(1) , a trabecular ROI attenuation cut-off of 160 HU was 100% sensitive for osteoporosis (29 of 29), with a specificity of 46.4% (104 of 224); 83.9% (125 of 149) below this threshold had low BMD and 57.5% (59/103) above had normal BMD at DXA. ROI performance was similar at all individual T(12) -L(5) levels. At ROC analysis, AUC for osteoporosis was 0.888 for phantomless QCT [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.780-0.946] and ranged from 0.825 to 0.853 using trabecular ROIs at single lumbar levels (0.864; 95% CI 0.752-0.930 at multivariate analysis). Supine-prone reproducibility was better with the simple ROI method compared with QCT. It is concluded that both phantomless QCT and simple ROI attenuation measurements of the lumbar spine are effective for BMD screening at CTC with high sensitivity for osteoporosis, as defined by the DXA T-score.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590738      PMCID: PMC3304444          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  29 in total

1.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Screening for osteoporosis: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Elizabeth M Haney; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Roger Chou
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom.

Authors:  S D Boden; D J Goodenough; C D Stockham; E Jacobs; T Dina; R M Allman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Feasibility of simultaneous computed tomographic colonography and fully automated bone mineral densitometry in a single examination.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers; Nicolai Baecher; Jianhua Yao; Jiamin Liu; Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Suvimol Hill
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; William R Schindler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Boris B Koppers; Thomas Licht; Jan Bauer; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique.

Authors:  P Steiger; J E Block; S Steiger; A F Heuck; A Friedlander; B Ettinger; S T Harris; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine, not dual x-ray absorptiometry, is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy.

Authors:  Q Rehman; T Lang; G Modin; N E Lane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-05

10.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; M Griffin; A Chines; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  85 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The use of computed tomography attenuation to evaluate osteoporosis following acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebra.

Authors:  Osa Emohare; Amanda Cagan; Robert Morgan; Rick Davis; Martin Asis; Julie Switzer; David W Polly
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

3.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening: Addition of Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Evaluation to CT Colonography.

Authors:  Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Neil Binkley; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Future Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Related to Lumbar Vertebral Trabecular Attenuation Measured at Routine Body CT.

Authors:  Scott J Lee; Peter M Graffy; Ryan D Zea; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Time dependency of bone density estimation from computed tomography with intravenous contrast agent administration.

Authors:  K Acu; M Scheel; A S Issever
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know?

Authors:  Rosario Francesco Balzano; Maria Mattera; Xiaoguang Cheng; Samantha Cornacchia; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

9.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Travis Lauder; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Richard J Bruce; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  P J Pickhardt; T Lauder; B D Pooler; A Muñoz Del Rio; H Rosas; R J Bruce; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.