J Perrier-Cornet1, A Y Omorou2, M Fauny3, D Loeuille3, I Chary-Valckenaere3. 1. Rheumatology department, University Hospital of Nancy, 5 rue du Morvan, 54500, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France. julia@perrier-cornet.fr. 2. Inserm, CIC-1433 Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France. 3. Rheumatology department, University Hospital of Nancy, 5 rue du Morvan, 54500, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Screening for osteoporosis is crucial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the value of thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT-derived bone mineral density (BMD) results in L1, compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results for osteoporosis screening in rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: Consecutive RA patients who underwent a CT-scan and DXA within a 2-year period were retrospectively included. The CT sagittal images were then evaluated for vertebral fractures from T4 to L5 using the Genant classification. The CT-attenuation values (in Hounsfield units (HU)) of trabecular bone in L1 were measured on axial images and compared to the DXA results. RESULTS: This study included 105 patients (mean age 61.1 years (± 9.5), 78.1% women). There were 28 patients (26.7%) with DXA-defined osteoporosis and 32 (30%) with osteoporotic fractures (vertebral and/or non-vertebral). The CT assessment indicated that the mean (SD) vertebral L1 attenuation was 142.2 HU (± 18.5). The diagnostic performance for the vertebral CT-attenuation measurement was acceptable: the AUC was 0.67 for predicting osteoporotic fractures and of 0.69 for predicting vertebral fractures. Among patients with osteoporotic fractures, there were 23 (74%) patients categorized as osteoporotic with a L1 CT-attenuation of 135 HU or less, whereas there were only 13 patients (42%) identified by DXA. CONCLUSION: CT offers a combined opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by assessing both vertebral fractures and bone density on routine CT-scans. This approach may be particularly interesting for RA patients with a high osteoporosis risk.
INTRODUCTION: Screening for osteoporosis is crucial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the value of thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT-derived bone mineral density (BMD) results in L1, compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results for osteoporosis screening in rheumatoid arthritispatients. METHODS: Consecutive RApatients who underwent a CT-scan and DXA within a 2-year period were retrospectively included. The CT sagittal images were then evaluated for vertebral fractures from T4 to L5 using the Genant classification. The CT-attenuation values (in Hounsfield units (HU)) of trabecular bone in L1 were measured on axial images and compared to the DXA results. RESULTS: This study included 105 patients (mean age 61.1 years (± 9.5), 78.1% women). There were 28 patients (26.7%) with DXA-defined osteoporosis and 32 (30%) with osteoporotic fractures (vertebral and/or non-vertebral). The CT assessment indicated that the mean (SD) vertebral L1 attenuation was 142.2 HU (± 18.5). The diagnostic performance for the vertebral CT-attenuation measurement was acceptable: the AUC was 0.67 for predicting osteoporotic fractures and of 0.69 for predicting vertebral fractures. Among patients with osteoporotic fractures, there were 23 (74%) patients categorized as osteoporotic with a L1 CT-attenuation of 135 HU or less, whereas there were only 13 patients (42%) identified by DXA. CONCLUSION: CT offers a combined opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by assessing both vertebral fractures and bone density on routine CT-scans. This approach may be particularly interesting for RApatients with a high osteoporosis risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; CT-attenuation; DXA; Osteoporosis; Rheumatoid arthritis
Authors: Klaus Engelke; Thomas Lang; Sundeep Khosla; Ling Qin; Philippe Zysset; William D Leslie; John A Shepherd; John T Shousboe Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Dana Bliuc; Nguyen D Nguyen; Vivienne E Milch; Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman; Jacqueline R Center Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Seo Young Kim; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jun Liu; Gregory W Daniel; Chun-Lan Chang; Katie Garneau; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Maxime Dougados; Martin Soubrier; Anna Antunez; Peter Balint; Alejandro Balsa; Maya H Buch; Gustavo Casado; Jacqueline Detert; Bassel El-Zorkany; Paul Emery; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni; Masayoshi Harigai; Shue-Fen Luo; Reka Kurucz; Gabriel Maciel; Emilio Martin Mola; Carlo Maurizio Montecucco; Iain McInnes; Helga Radner; Josef S Smolen; Yeong-Wook Song; Harald Erwin Vonkeman; Kevin Winthrop; Jonathan Kay Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Thang Nguyen; Alberto A Perez; Peter M Graffy; Samuel Jang; Ronald M Summers; John W Garrett Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2022-08-31
Authors: Justin J Tse; Ainsley C J Smith; Michael T Kuczynski; Daphne A Kaketsis; Sarah L Manske Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 5.096