Literature DB >> 29308913

L1 vertebral density on CT is too variable with different scanning protocols to be a useful screening tool for osteoporosis in everyday practice.

Emma-Louise Gerety1, Philip Wp Bearcroft1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a single L1 density threshold can be used to screen all patients undergoing CT at a busy tertiary referral centre for those at risk of osteoporosis.
METHODS: 200 patients, who had been randomly selected for an audit of CT reporting of incidental vertebral fractures, had their L1 density measured on 864 routine CT examinations. These had been performed with a variety of kVp and intravenous (i.v.) contrast protocols, reflecting the wide range of imaging indications.
RESULTS: L1 density measured on thick axial, thin axial or sagittal images had an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (0.996). For the same patients imaged twice within 6 months, there was mean intraexamination L1 density difference of 27.5 HU. Variability due to i.v. contrast medium administration resulted in a mean difference of 24.5 HU. Mean difference due to acquisition kVp was 24.1 HU. Once matched for sex, age, kVp and i.v. contrast, there was a significant difference between the L1 density in patients with vertebral fractures compared to those without fractures (mean 30.19 HU).
CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the L1 vertebral body CT density due to differences in acquisition variables such as kVp and timing post-i.v. contrast medium. Advances in knowledge: Previous studies suggested that L1 CT density could be used to screen for osteoporosis. The current study cautions that it is not possible to define a single L1 density threshold for screening, due to the number of variables within a wide range of scanning protocols for different imaging indications in everyday practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29308913      PMCID: PMC5966006          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  20 in total

1.  The use of computed tomography attenuation to evaluate osteoporosis following acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebra.

Authors:  Osa Emohare; Amanda Cagan; Robert Morgan; Rick Davis; Martin Asis; Julie Switzer; David W Polly
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  The reliability of measuring the density of the L1 vertebral body on CT imaging as a predictor of bone mineral density.

Authors:  E-L Gerety; M A Hopper; P W P Bearcroft
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT.

Authors:  Esther Pompe; Martin J Willemink; Gawein R Dijkhuis; Harald J J Verhaar; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Lawrence J Lee; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Travis Lauder; Richard J Bruce; Ron M Summers; B Dustin Pooler; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Travis Lauder; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Richard J Bruce; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Lower preoperative Hounsfield unit measurements are associated with adjacent segment fracture after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Dennis S Meredith; Joseph J Schreiber; Fadi Taher; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anti-Osteoporotic Therapy After Fragility Fracture Lowers Rate of Subsequent Fracture: Analysis of a Large Population Sample.

Authors:  Harpreet S Bawa; Jack Weick; Douglas R Dirschl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Correlation between Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Hounsfield Units Measured by Diagnostic CT in Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Sungjoon Lee; Chun Kee Chung; So Hee Oh; Sung Bae Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-11-30

10.  Inter-observer and inter-examination variability of manual vertebral bone attenuation measurements on computed tomography.

Authors:  Esther Pompe; Pim A de Jong; Werner U de Jong; Richard A P Takx; Anouk L M Eikendal; Martin J Willemink; Matthijs Oudkerk; Ricardo P J Budde; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to Fracture Risk Assessment and Prevention.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Robert Blank
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Computed Tomography-Based L1 Bone Mineral Density in 624 Dutch Trauma Patients-Are North American Reference Values Valid in Europe?

Authors:  Tim Kobes; Arthur Sweet; Sophie Verstegen; Marijn Houwert; Wouter Veldhuis; Luke Leenen; Pim de Jong; Mark van Baal
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.