Mohamad Farhan Mohamad Amin1,2,3, Wan Mezlina Wan Zakaria1, Noorazrul Yahya4. 1. Radiology Department, Hospital Putrajaya, Precint 7, 62000, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 2. Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 3. Radiology Department, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, Jalan Langat, 41200, Klang, Selangor, Malaysia. 4. Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. noorazrul.yahya@ukm.edu.my.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: CT examination can potentially be utilised for early detection of bone density changes with no additional procedure and radiation dose. We hypothesise that the Hounsfield unit (HU) measured from CT images is correlated to the t-scores derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in multiple anatomic regions. MATERIALS & METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from all patients who underwent both CT examinations - brain (frontal bone), thorax (T7), abdomen (L3), spine (T7 & L3) or pelvis (left hip) - and DXA between 2014 and 2018 in our centre. To ensure comparability, the period between CT and DXA studies must not exceed one year. Correlations between HU values and t-scores were calculated using Pearson's correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine threshold HU values for predicting osteoporosis. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 1043 CT examinations (136 head, 537 thorax, 159 lumbar and 151 left hip). The left hip consistently provided the most robust correlations (r = 0.664-0.708, p < 0.001) and the best AUC (0.875-0.893). Meanwhile, thorax T7 and lumbar L3 showed average correlations (range of r values is 0.497-0.679, p < 0.001, AUC range = 0.680-0.783, 95% CI 0.561-0.922, all p < 0.02) and moderate AUC (0.680-0.783). Frontal bone shows low correlation and weak AUC with r < 0.5, AUC = 0.538-0.655, all p > 0.05. CONCLUSION: HU values derived from the hip, T7 and L3 provided a good to moderate correlation to t-scores with a good prediction for osteoporosis. The suggested optimal thresholds may be used in clinical settings after external validations are performed.
OBJECTIVES: CT examination can potentially be utilised for early detection of bone density changes with no additional procedure and radiation dose. We hypothesise that the Hounsfield unit (HU) measured from CT images is correlated to the t-scores derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in multiple anatomic regions. MATERIALS & METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from all patients who underwent both CT examinations - brain (frontal bone), thorax (T7), abdomen (L3), spine (T7 & L3) or pelvis (left hip) - and DXA between 2014 and 2018 in our centre. To ensure comparability, the period between CT and DXA studies must not exceed one year. Correlations between HU values and t-scores were calculated using Pearson's correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine threshold HU values for predicting osteoporosis. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 1043 CT examinations (136 head, 537 thorax, 159 lumbar and 151 left hip). The left hip consistently provided the most robust correlations (r = 0.664-0.708, p < 0.001) and the best AUC (0.875-0.893). Meanwhile, thorax T7 and lumbar L3 showed average correlations (range of r values is 0.497-0.679, p < 0.001, AUC range = 0.680-0.783, 95% CI 0.561-0.922, all p < 0.02) and moderate AUC (0.680-0.783). Frontal bone shows low correlation and weak AUC with r < 0.5, AUC = 0.538-0.655, all p > 0.05. CONCLUSION: HU values derived from the hip, T7 and L3 provided a good to moderate correlation to t-scores with a good prediction for osteoporosis. The suggested optimal thresholds may be used in clinical settings after external validations are performed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; Computed tomography; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Hounsfield unit; Osteoporosis
Authors: S Y Lee; S-S Kwon; H S Kim; J H Yoo; J Kim; J Y Kim; B C Min; S J Moon; K H Sung Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Elisabeth A P M Romme; John T Murchison; Kee F Phang; Frits H Jansen; Erica P A Rutten; Emiel F M Wouters; Frank W J M Smeenk; Edwin J R Van Beek; William Macnee Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Travis Lauder; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Richard J Bruce; Neil Binkley Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: P J Pickhardt; T Lauder; B D Pooler; A Muñoz Del Rio; H Rosas; R J Bruce; N Binkley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: H-S Nam; M-H Shin; J M Zmuda; P C Leung; E Barrett-Connor; E S Orwoll; J A Cauley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 4.507