Literature DB >> 26404838

Arrested replication forks guide retrotransposon integration.

Jake Z Jacobs1, Jesus D Rosado-Lugo1, Susanne Cranz-Mileva1, Keith M Ciccaglione1, Vincent Tournier1, Mikel Zaratiegui2.   

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are an abundant class of genomic parasites that replicate by insertion of new copies into the host genome. Fungal LTR retrotransposons prevent mutagenic insertions through diverse targeting mechanisms that avoid coding sequences, but conserved principles guiding their target site selection have not been established. Here, we show that insertion of the fission yeast LTR retrotransposon Tf1 is guided by the DNA binding protein Sap1 and that the efficiency and location of the targeting depend on the activity of Sap1 as a replication fork barrier. We propose that Sap1 and the fork arrest it causes guide insertion of Tf1 by tethering the integration complex to target sites.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26404838      PMCID: PMC4832573          DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  39 in total

Review 1.  Targeting survival: integration site selection by retroviruses and LTR-retrotransposons.

Authors:  Frederic D Bushman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Analysis of chromatin in fission yeast.

Authors:  Alison Pidoux; Barbara Mellone; Robin Allshire
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Retrotransposon profiling of RNA polymerase III initiation sites.

Authors:  Xiaojie Qi; Kenneth Daily; Kim Nguyen; Haoyi Wang; David Mayhew; Paul Rigor; Sholeh Forouzan; Mark Johnston; Robi David Mitra; Pierre Baldi; Suzanne Sandmeyer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Retrotransposons. An RNA polymerase III subunit determines sites of retrotransposon integration.

Authors:  Antoine Bridier-Nahmias; Aurélie Tchalikian-Cosson; Joshua A Baller; Rachid Menouni; Hélène Fayol; Amando Flores; Ali Saïb; Michel Werner; Daniel F Voytas; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Vulnerabilities on the lagging-strand template: opportunities for mobile elements.

Authors:  Ashwana D Fricker; Joseph E Peters
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Fission yeast Sap1 protein is essential for chromosome stability.

Authors:  Raynald de Lahondès; Veronique Ribes; Benoit Arcangioli
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-10

7.  Transcription termination factor reb1p causes two replication fork barriers at its cognate sites in fission yeast ribosomal DNA in vivo.

Authors:  Alicia Sánchez-Gorostiaga; Carlos López-Estraño; Dora B Krimer; Jorge B Schvartzman; Pablo Hernández
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  Human transposon tectonics.

Authors:  Kathleen H Burns; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The essential Schizosaccharomyces pombe Pfh1 DNA helicase promotes fork movement past G-quadruplex motifs to prevent DNA damage.

Authors:  Nasim Sabouri; John A Capra; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Serial number tagging reveals a prominent sequence preference of retrotransposon integration.

Authors:  Atreyi Ghatak Chatterjee; Caroline Esnault; Yabin Guo; Stevephen Hung; Philip G McQueen; Henry L Levin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  22 in total

1.  Shelterin components mediate genome reorganization in response to replication stress.

Authors:  Takeshi Mizuguchi; Nitika Taneja; Emiko Matsuda; Jon-Matthew Belton; Peter FitzGerald; Job Dekker; Shiv I S Grewal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Tania Sultana; Alessia Zamborlini; Gael Cristofari; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Chromatin remodeler Fft3 plays a dual role at blocked DNA replication forks.

Authors:  Anissia Ait-Saada; Olga Khorosjutina; Jiang Chen; Karol Kramarz; Vladimir Maksimov; J Peter Svensson; Sarah Lambert; Karl Ekwall
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2019-10-01

4.  Spontaneous mutations in maize pollen are frequent in some lines and arise mainly from retrotranspositions and deletions.

Authors:  Hugo K Dooner; Qinghua Wang; Jun T Huang; Yubin Li; Limei He; Wenwei Xiong; Chunguang Du
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Light and shadow on the mechanisms of integration site selection in yeast Ty retrotransposon families.

Authors:  Amandine Bonnet; Pascale Lesage
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Mobile genetic elements: in silico, in vitro, in vivo.

Authors:  Irina R Arkhipova; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Integration and Fixation Preferences of Human and Mouse Endogenous Retroviruses Uncovered with Functional Data Analysis.

Authors:  Rebeca Campos-Sánchez; Marzia A Cremona; Alessia Pini; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Host factors that promote retrotransposon integration are similar in distantly related eukaryotes.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar Rai; Maya Sangesland; Michael Lee; Caroline Esnault; Yujin Cui; Atreyi Ghatak Chatterjee; Henry L Levin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Transposon-mediated directed mutation in bacteria and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Milton H Saier; Chika Kukita; Zhongge Zhang
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2017-03-01

10.  Mutations Affecting Potassium Import Restore the Viability of the Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase III holD Mutant.

Authors:  Adeline Durand; Anurag Kumar Sinha; Cloelia Dard-Dascot; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.