Literature DB >> 25195506

Vulnerabilities on the lagging-strand template: opportunities for mobile elements.

Ashwana D Fricker1, Joseph E Peters.   

Abstract

Mobile genetic elements have the ability to move between positions in a genome. Some of these elements are capable of targeting one of the template strands during DNA replication. Examples found in bacteria include (a) Red recombination mediated by bacteriophage λ, (b) integration of group II mobile introns that reverse splice and reverse transcribe into DNA, (c) HUH endonuclease elements that move as single-stranded DNA, and (d) Tn7, a DNA cut-and-paste transposon that uses a target-site-selecting protein to target transposition into certain forms of DNA replication. In all of these examples, the lagging-strand template appears to be targeted using a variety of features specific to this strand. These features appear especially available in certain situations, such as when replication forks stall or collapse. In this review, we address the idea that features specific to the lagging-strand template represent vulnerabilities that are capitalized on by mobile genetic elements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication; HUH elements; Red recombination; group II intron; lagging-strand template; replication fork collapse; replication fork stalls; transposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25195506     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genet        ISSN: 0066-4197            Impact factor:   16.830


  12 in total

Review 1.  RecBCD is required to complete chromosomal replication: Implications for double-strand break frequencies and repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Justin Courcelle; Brian M Wendel; Dena D Livingstone; Charmain T Courcelle
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-05-02

2.  Arrested replication forks guide retrotransposon integration.

Authors:  Jake Z Jacobs; Jesus D Rosado-Lugo; Susanne Cranz-Mileva; Keith M Ciccaglione; Vincent Tournier; Mikel Zaratiegui
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Zebrafish transposable elements show extensive diversification in age, genomic distribution, and developmental expression.

Authors:  Ni-Chen Chang; Quirze Rovira; Jonathan Wells; Cédric Feschotte; Juan M Vaquerizas
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 9.438

4.  Mobile genetic elements: in silico, in vitro, in vivo.

Authors:  Irina R Arkhipova; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  CRISPR-Cas in mobile genetic elements: counter-defence and beyond.

Authors:  Guilhem Faure; Sergey A Shmakov; Winston X Yan; David R Cheng; David A Scott; Joseph E Peters; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Cell-cycle-dependent EBNA1-DNA crosslinking promotes replication termination at oriP and viral episome maintenance.

Authors:  Jayaraju Dheekollu; Andreas Wiedmer; Kasirajan Ayyanathan; Julianna S Deakyne; Troy E Messick; Paul M Lieberman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Hopping into a hot seat: Role of DNA structural features on IS5-mediated gene activation and inactivation under stress.

Authors:  M Zafri Humayun; Zhongge Zhang; Anna M Butcher; Aref Moshayedi; Milton H Saier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Cross-Regulation between Transposable Elements and Host DNA Replication.

Authors:  Mikel Zaratiegui
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Conformational toggling controls target site choice for the heteromeric transposase element Tn7.

Authors:  Qiaojuan Shi; Marco R Straus; Jeremy J Caron; Huasheng Wang; Yu Seon Chung; Alba Guarné; Joseph E Peters
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Single strand transposition at the host replication fork.

Authors:  Laure Lavatine; Susu He; Anne Caumont-Sarcos; Catherine Guynet; Brigitte Marty; Mick Chandler; Bao Ton-Hoang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.