Long Jiang Zhang1, Yining Wang2, U Joseph Schoepf3,4, Felix G Meinel4,5, Richard R Bayer4, Li Qi3, Jian Cao2, Chang Sheng Zhou3, Yan E Zhao3, Xie Li3, Jian Bin Gong6, Zhengyu Jin7, Guang Ming Lu8. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. kevinzhlj@163.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, MSC 226, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. 5. Institute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany. 6. Department of Cardiology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. 7. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. jin_zhengyu@163.com. 8. Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. cjr.luguangming@vip.163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic performance of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 70 kVp compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70 kVp using 30 cc (11 g iodine) contrast medium and ICA. Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated for each CCTA study. CCTA performance for diagnosing ≥50% stenosis was assessed. Results were stratified according to heart rate (HR), body mass index (BMI), Agatston score, and image quality. RESULTS: At CCTA, 94.3% (500/530) of coronary segments were of diagnostic quality. Using ICA as reference standard, sensitivity and accuracy were 100% and 93.0% on a per-patient basis. Per-vessel and per-segment performances were 92.2% and 89.5%; 79.5% and 88.3%, respectively. No differences were found in diagnostic accuracy between different HR, BMI, and calcification subgroups (all P > 0.05) on a per-patient basis. However, low image quality reduced diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment basis (all P < 0.05). The mean effective radiation dose was 0.2 ± 0.0 mSv. CONCLUSION: Our presented protocol results in an effective radiation dose of 0.2 mSv and high diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection in a selected, non-obese population. KEY POINTS: Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70 kVp is feasible. This protocol has a high diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection. The mean effective radiation dose was 0.2 ± 0.0 mSv. Only 30 cc of contrast material is used in this protocol. Low image quality reduced diagnostic accuracy of CCTA.
PURPOSE: To investigate image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic performance of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 70 kVp compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70 kVp using 30 cc (11 g iodine) contrast medium and ICA. Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated for each CCTA study. CCTA performance for diagnosing ≥50% stenosis was assessed. Results were stratified according to heart rate (HR), body mass index (BMI), Agatston score, and image quality. RESULTS: At CCTA, 94.3% (500/530) of coronary segments were of diagnostic quality. Using ICA as reference standard, sensitivity and accuracy were 100% and 93.0% on a per-patient basis. Per-vessel and per-segment performances were 92.2% and 89.5%; 79.5% and 88.3%, respectively. No differences were found in diagnostic accuracy between different HR, BMI, and calcification subgroups (all P > 0.05) on a per-patient basis. However, low image quality reduced diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment basis (all P < 0.05). The mean effective radiation dose was 0.2 ± 0.0 mSv. CONCLUSION: Our presented protocol results in an effective radiation dose of 0.2 mSv and high diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection in a selected, non-obese population. KEY POINTS: Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70 kVp is feasible. This protocol has a high diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection. The mean effective radiation dose was 0.2 ± 0.0 mSv. Only 30 cc of contrast material is used in this protocol. Low image quality reduced diagnostic accuracy of CCTA.
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Young Joo Suh; Young Jin Kim; Sae Rom Hong; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Jin Hur; Byoung Wook Choi Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Felix G Meinel; John W Nance; Brett S Harris; Carlo N De Cecco; Philip Costello; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; Salvatore A Chiaramida; Philip Costello; Fabian Bamberg; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Felix G Meinel; Christian Canstein; U Joseph Schoepf; Martin Sedlmaier; Bernhard Schmidt; Brett S Harris; Thomas G Flohr; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; U Joseph Schoepf; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Ralf Lehmann; Sonja Sudarski; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Matthew S Davenport; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Richard H Cohan; Jonathan R Dillman; James D Myles; James H Ellis Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Xiao Kun Fang; Qian Qian Ni; U Joseph Schoepf; Chang Sheng Zhou; Guo Zhong Chen; Song Luo; Stephen R Fuller; Carlo N De Cecco; Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Moritz H Albrecht; John W Nance; U Joseph Schoepf; Brian E Jacobs; Richard R Bayer; Sheldon E Litwin; Michael A Reynolds; Katharina Otani; Stefanie Mangold; Akos Varga-Szemes; Domenico De Santis; Marwen Eid; Georg Apfaltrer; Christian Tesche; Markus Goeller; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Olivier F Clerc; Basil P Kaufmann; Mathias Possner; Riccardo Liga; Jan Vontobel; Fran Mikulicic; Christoph Gräni; Dominik C Benz; Tobias A Fuchs; Julia Stehli; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 5.315